The Inter American Press Association in the Architecture of Media-Corporate Terrorism

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22370/syt.2025.12.5557

Keywords:

State Terrorism; SIP/IAPA; Corporate Media Terrorism; Southern Cone Dictatorships; Press

Abstract

The press often claims for itself the status of guardian of democracy and impartial mediator of public debate. However, the historical analysis of regimes of exception in Latin America –and, in particular, in the countries of the Southern Cone– reveals a profoundly ambiguous role, if not one of direct complicity, played by significant media conglomerates in the legitimation and support of authoritarian projects. At the core of this web of relations lies the Inter American Press Association (SIP/IAPA), founded in 1943 under the strong impulse of U.S. foreign policy, in the context of the consolidation of its continental hegemony in the post-Second World War era (1939-1945). Far from functioning merely as a professional forum or as an abstract defender of press freedom, the SIP/IAPA consolidated itself as a hub for the articulation of business, political, and ideological interests, promoting agendas convergent with U.S. geopolitical logic and mobilizing the discourse of “press freedom” as a tool for legitimizing its activities and disqualifying political projects adverse to the interests of its corporate bases.

The concept of corporate media terrorism thus emerges as a tool for understanding the active role of the press in naturalizing the state of exception. Contrary to interpretations that oppose the press and authoritarianism as irreconcilable poles, this research reveals the symbiosis between media elites and regimes of exception. This symbiosis was achieved through coordinated networks of disinformation, selective censorship, and editorial synchronization—sustained by agencies such as the CIA, the National Endowment for Democracy (NED), the Ford Foundation, Freedom House, and other structures of ideological influence tied to U.S. imperialism.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Agee, P. (1977): The CIA and the Press. New York, Ocean Press.

Basualdo, E. (2006): Estudios de historia económica argentina: Desde mediados del siglo XX a la actualidad. Buenos Aires, Siglo XXI.

Basualdo, V. (2006a): Concentración y centralización del capital en la Argentina durante la dictadura militar (1976-1983). Buenos Aires, CLACSO.

Basualdo, V. (2006b): “Complicidad patronal-militar en la última dictadura argentina: Los casos de Acindar, Astarsa, Dálmine Siderca, Ford, Ledesma y Mercedes Benz”, Revista Engranajes, Suplemento Especial, pp. 1-27.

Basualdo. V., P. Barragán y F. Rodríguez (2010): “La clase trabajadora durante la última dictadura militar argentina (1976–1983)”, Memoria en las aulas, 13, pp. 1-44.

Calveiro, P. (1998): Poder y desaparición. Buenos Aires, Colihue.

Cañón, P. (2018): Terrorismo de Estado y poder en la Argentina (1955–1983): Hegemonía y coerción en la reconfiguración del Estado capitalista dependiente. Buenos Aires, CLACSO.

Carothers, T. (1999): Aiding Democracy Abroad: The Learning Curve. Washington, DC, Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.

Chasin, J. (1994): A via colonial e a autocracia burguesa. São Paulo, Ensaio.

Dreifuss, R. A. (1981): 1964: A conquista do Estado: Ação política, poder e golpe de classe. Petrópolis, Vozes.

Figueroa, C. (1991): El recurso del miedo: Estado y terror en Guatemala. Caracas, Nueva Sociedad.

Gago, V. (2014): La razón neoliberal: Economías barrocas y pragmática popular. Buenos Aires, Tinta Limón/CLACSO.

Gargurevich, J. (1981): La prensa sensacionalista en el Perú. Lima, Centro de Estudios y Promoción del Desarrollo (DESCO).

Invernizzi, H. (2005): La SIP y la lucha anticomunista en América Latina. Buenos Aires, CLACSO.

Landis, F. (1982): “CIA media operations in Chile, Jamaica and Nicaragua”, Covert Action Information Bulletin, 16, pp. 32-43.

Lukács, G. (2012): Para uma ontologia do ser social (Tomo II). São Paulo, Boitempo.

Lukács, G. (1981): Estética. 2 vols. Barcelona, Grijalbo.

McSherry, J. P. (2005): Predatory States: Operation Condor and Covert War in Latin America. Lanham, Rowman & Littlefield.

O’Donnell, G. (1973): Modernization and Bureaucratic-Authoritarianism: studies in South American politics. Berkeley, CA, Institute of International Studies, University of California.

O’Donnell, G. (1990): Análise do autoritarismo burocrático. Rio de Janeiro, Paz e Terra.

Robinson, W. (1996): Promoting Polyarchy: Globalization, US Intervention, and Hegemony. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.

Ron, Y. (2008): Los amos de la SIP. Caracas, República Bolivariana de Venezuela.

Selser, G. (1987): Breve historia de la SIP. México, Editorial Diógenes.

Silva, E. G. (2008): A Rede da Democracia: a articulação da grande imprensa e do empresariado no combate às reformas de base (1961–1964). Tese (Doutorado em História), Universidade Federal Fluminense, Niterói.

Steinsleger, J. (2006): La SIP: La mafia de la prensa hemisférica. México, La Jornada.

Stonor, F. (1999): The Cultural Cold War: The CIA and the World of Arts and Letters. New York, The New Press.

Vieira, V. (2025): A Cia Docas/CODESP (1965–1985) contra trabalhadores sob a suspensão de direitos (1964-1985), Projeto História, 82, pp. 458-484.

Published

2025-12-23

Issue

Section

Dosier Terrorismo de Estado en América: Análisis y Comparaciones

How to Cite

The Inter American Press Association in the Architecture of Media-Corporate Terrorism. (2025). Sur Y Tiempo: Revista De Historia De América, 6(12), 30-62. https://doi.org/10.22370/syt.2025.12.5557

Similar Articles

1-10 of 34

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.