Abstract
The World Health Organization (WHO) indicates that midwives can meet up to 87% of essential sexual and reproductive health needs [1]. Furthermore, international studies have demonstrated that midwife-led care models improve maternal and neonatal outcomes and reduce unnecessary interventions [2,4,9]. However, their participation in national governance remains limited, creating gaps between available evidence and health decision-making [3].
Scientific evidence supports that midwifery has a direct impact on reducing maternal and neonatal morbidity and mortality [2,4], while also contributing to enhancing patient experience and decreasing unnecessary interventions in healthcare processes [9].
The integrated health services networks model promotes continuity of care, coordination across healthcare levels, and people-centered care [6]. Midwifery care management, being present across all levels of the healthcare network in Chile, plays a key role in articulating these processes, thereby preventing fragmentation of care [6,7].
On the other hand, the health rights approach has highlighted the need to advance toward more humanized care models. Various studies have documented the existence of mistreatment during childbirth care, which constitutes a violation of rights [5,8]. Nonetheless, midwife-led models have been shown to reduce these practices and promote respectful care [5].
Despite this evidence, structural barriers persist that limit the participation of midwifery at decision-making levels, which impacts the quality and efficiency of the healthcare system [3].
Leadership in national-level Midwifery Care Management is essential to strengthen health systems, improve clinical outcomes, and guarantee respect for sexual and reproductive health rights [1,2,8]. Integrating this discipline into governance spaces constitutes a technical, ethical, and sanitary necessity to advance toward a more equitable, people-centered care model with a human rights approach.
References
1. World Health Organization. The State of the World’s Midwifery 2021: building a healthy workforce to ensure universal sexual, reproductive, maternal and newborn health and rights. Geneva: WHO; 2021.
2. Renfrew MJ, McFadden A, Bastos MH, Campbell J, Channon AA, Cheung NF, et al. Midwifery and quality care: findings from a new evidence-informed framework for maternal and newborn care. Lancet. 2014;384(9948):1129–45.
3. Nove A, Friberg IK, de Bernis L, McConville F, Moran AC, Najjemba M, et al. Potential impact of midwives in preventing and reducing maternal and neonatal mortality and stillbirths: a Lives Saved Tool modelling study. Lancet Glob Health. 2021;9(1):e24–32.
4. Homer CSE, Friberg IK, Dias MAB, ten Hoope-Bender P, Sandall J, Speciale AM, et al. The projected effect of scaling up midwifery. Lancet. 2014;384(9948):1146–57.
5. Bohren MA, Vogel JP, Hunter EC, Lutsiv O, Makh SK, Souza JP, et al. The mistreatment of women during childbirth in health facilities globally: a mixed-methods systematic review. Lancet. 2015;387(10017):712–21.
6. Organización Panamericana de la Salud (OPS). Redes Integradas de Servicios de Salud: conceptos, opciones de política y hoja de ruta para su implementación en las Américas. Washington DC: OPS; 2010.
7. World Health Organization. WHO recommendations on antenatal care for a positive pregnancy experience. Geneva: WHO; 2016.
8. ONU Mujeres. Violencia obstétrica y derechos humanos de las mujeres. Nueva York: ONU Mujeres; 2020.
9. Miller S, Abalos E, Chamillard M, Ciapponi A, Colaci D, Comandé D, et al. Beyond too little, too late and too much, too soon: a pathway towards evidence-based, respectful maternity care worldwide. Lancet. 2016;388(10056):2176–92.
10. United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA). State of the World’s Midwifery 2020: delivering health, saving lives. New York: UNFPA; 2020.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2026 Lorena Gutiérrez-Mundt

