On Division of Reason in Kant: The Rupture with the Absolute Rationality System
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22370/rhv2018iss11pp39-74Keywords:
Reason, Understanding, Judgment, Sensibility, FacultiesAbstract
This article intends to show how the philosophy of Kant supposes a rupture with the doctrines based on a system of absolute rationality, where the most important element is the unity of reason. In this way, it will try to underline the main critiques of the Prussian philosopher to theories based on the unity of reason and direct access to reality, as well as exposing the Kantian proposal of a unitary formal rational structure, but with several irreconcilable uses.
References
Allison, Henry, E. (1992). El idealismo trascendental de Kant: una interpretación y defensa. Barcelona: Anthropos.
Anderson, R. Lanier (2005). The Wolffian Paradigm and Its Discontents: Kant’s Containment Definition of Analyticity in Historical Context. Archiv fuer Geschichte der Philosophie, 87(1), 22–74.
Arana, Juan (1979). El problema de la unidad del conocimiento en Christian Wolff. Anuario filosófico, Año 15, 12 (2), Navarra: Servicio de Publicaciones de la Universidad de Navarra, 9-29.
Blumemberg, Hans (2003). Paradigmas de una metaforología. Madrid: Trotta.
Cavana, Mª Luisa P. (1995). Christian Wolff: (1679- 1754). Madrid: Ediciones de Orto.
Cherpenel, Eduardo (2011). Pensar la moral desde la belleza: una lectura del parágrafo cincuenta y nueve de la Kritik der Urteilskraft. Tópicos, 41, 183-219.
De Boer, Karin (2016). Categories versus Schemata: Kant’s Two-Aspects Theory of Pure Concepts and His Critique of Wolffian Metaphysics. Journal of the History of Philosophy, 54(3), 441-468
Duque, Félix (1998). Historia de la Filosofía Moderna. La era de la crítica. Madrid: Akal.
Gadamer, Hans-Georg (1991). Verdad y método: fundamentos de una hermenéutica filosófica. Salamanca: Sígueme.
García Norro, J. J., Rovira, R. (2011). Introducción. En Kant, I. Crítica del Juicio. Madrid: Tecnos.
Gardner, Sebastian (2006). The Primacy of Practical Reason. En G. Bird (ed.), A Companion to Kant (pp. 259–274). Oxford: Blackwell.
Hegel, G. W. F (1955). Lecciones sobre Historia de la Filosofía. Vol. III. México: Fondo de Cultura Económica.
Hernández, Maximiliano (2010). Estudio introductorio. En Immanuel Kant II, Madrid: Gredos.
Kant, Immanuel (1970). Letter to K. L. Reinhold, december 28 and 31, 1787 [vol. X, 513-515]. En Arnulf Zweig (ed.) Kant Philosophical Correspondence 1759-99 (pp. 127-128). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Kant, I. (1970). Letter to Fichte august 7, 1799, [vol. XII No. 6, 370371]. En Arnulf Zweig (ed.) Kant Philosophical Correspondence 1759-99 (pp. 253-254). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Kant, I. (1987). Los sueños de un visionario explicados por los sueños de la metafísica. Madrid: Alianza.
Kant, I. (1991). Sobre la paz perpetua. Madrid: Tecnos.
Kant, I. (1992). Inquiry Concerning the Distinctness of the Principles of Natural Theology and Morality (1764). En D. Walford (ed.), Theoretical Philosophy, 1755-177 (The Cambridge Edition of the Works of Immanuel Kant, pp. 243-246). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kant, I. (1999). Prolegómenos a toda metafísica futura que haya poder presentarse como ciencia. Madrid: Istmo.
Kant, I. (2010a). Crítica de la razón pura. En: Immanuel Kant I, Madrid: Gredos.
Kant, I. (2010b). Crítica de la razón práctica. En: Immanuel Kant II. Madrid: Gredos.
Kant, I. (2011). Crítica del Juicio. Madrid: Tecnos.
Leserre, Daniel (2005). Lenguaje y símbolo: el § 59 de la crítica de la facultad de juzgar en verdad y método. Endoxa: Series Filosóficas, (20), 587–600.
Michelle, Grier (2001). Kant’s Doctrine of Transcendental Illusion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Neville, Michael R. (1975). Kant on Beauty as the Symbol of Morality. Philosophy Research Archives, 1(1053), 141-167.
Nuzzo, Angelica (2005). Kant and the Unity of Reason. Indiana: Pardua University Press.
Strawson, Peter F. (2006). The Bounds of Sense. An Essay on Kant’s Critique of Pure Reason. London: Routledge
Torretti, Roberto (1967). Manuel Kant. Estudio sobre los fundamentos de la filosofía crítica. Santiago: Ediciones de la Universidad de Chile.
Villacañas, José Luis (2001). Esferas de acción y sistema filosófico. El carácter imprescindible de la metáfora. Δαίμων Revista de Filosofía, Año 13, (24), Universidad de Murcia, 111-126.
Villacañas, José Luis (2010). Estudio introductorio. En: Immanuel Kant I. Madrid: Gredos.
Weber, Max (2001). Ensayos sobre sociología de la religión I. Madrid: Taurus.
Willaschek, Marcus (2010). The Primacy of Practical Reason and the Idea of a Practical Postulate. En A. Reath & J. Timmermann (eds.), Kant’s Critique of Practical Reason: A Critical Guide (pp. 168–196). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Wolff, Christian (1963). Preliminary Discourse on Philosophy in General. Trad. Richard J. Blackwell. Indianapolis: The Bobbs-Merrill Company, Inc.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication, with the work after publication simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 International) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
