Attraction Basins and Unlimited Semiosis

Authors

  • Miguel Fuentes Rebolledo IIF-Sadaf/CONICET

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22370/rhv2016iss7pp77-86

Keywords:

interpretation, unlimited semiosis, stochastic processes, conceptual basin, attractors

Abstract

This paper argues in favor of the ambiguity in the interpretive process and mechanisms that can lead to stop the so-called unlimited semiosis. As we shall see, our way of approaching the problem can be used in other contexts, and the resulting conclusions can be applied to text, artwork, spoken messages, and to any sign to be interpreted.

References

ECO, U. (1992). Los límites de la interpretación. Barcelona: Editorial Lumen.

DRETSKE, F. (1982). Knowledge and the Flow of Information. Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press.

GARDENFORS, P. (2000). Conceptual Spaces. The Geometry of Thought. Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press.

GENDE, C.E. (2010). Problemas filosóficos de la interpretación: del lenguaje de los interpretantes al lenguaje del intérprete. Seminario de Posgrado. Neuquén: Universidad Nacional del Comahue.

PERLOVSKY, L. (2001). Neural Networks and Intellect: Using Model-Based Concepts. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

FUENTES, M.A. & MIGUEL, H. (2013). “Self Generated Dynamic Landscape”, en Physica A 392: 2492-2497.

FUENTES et al. (2014). “Frontier in Computational Neuroscience. Stochastic model predicts evolving preferences in the Iowa gambling task”, en Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience 5: 167.

Published

2016-07-29

How to Cite

Fuentes Rebolledo, M. (2016). Attraction Basins and Unlimited Semiosis. Revista De Humanidades De Valparaíso, (7), 77–86. https://doi.org/10.22370/rhv2016iss7pp77-86

Issue

Section

Articles

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.