Introduction to the Monographic Section: The Role of Intuitions in Analytic Philosophy
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22370/rhv2024iss24pp1-7References
Almagro, M., Bordonaba-Plou, D. & Villanueva, N. (2023). Retraction in public settings. Synthese, 202, 137. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-023-04348-3
Andow, J. (2015). How “intuition” exploded. Metaphilosophy, 46(2), 189-212. https://doi.org/10.1111/meta.12127
Baz, A. (2012). When words are called for: A defense of ordinary language philosophy. Cambridge University Press.
Bealer, G. (1998). Intuition and the autonomy of philosophy. In M. DePaul, W. Ramsey (Eds.), Rethinking intuition: The psychology of intuition and its role in philosophical inquiry (pp. 201-240). Rowman & Littlefield.
Beddor, B. & Egan, A. (2018). Might do better: Flexible relativism and the QUD. Semantics and Pragmatics, 11(7).
Bengson, J. (2015). The Intellectual Given. Mind, 124(495), 707-760. https://doi.org/10.1093/mind/fzv029
Bluhm, R. (2013). Don’t Ask, Look! Linguistic Corpora as a Tool for Conceptual Analysis. In M. Hoeltje, T. Spitzley, W. Spohn (Eds.), Was dürfen wir glauben? Was sollen wir tun? Sektionsbeiträge des achten internationalen Kongresses der Gesellschaft für Analytische Philosophie e.V. (pp. 7-15). DuEPublico.
Bluhm, R. (2016). Corpus Analysis in Philosophy. In M. Hinton (Ed.), Evidence, Experiment and Argument in Linguistics and Philosophy of Language (pp. 91-109). Peter Lang.
Bordonaba-Plou, D. (2021). An analysis of the centrality of intuition talk in the discussion on taste disagreements. Filozofia Nauki, 29(2), 133-156. https://doi.org/10.14394/filnau.2021.0008
Bordonaba-Plou, D. (2023). Métodos de corpus: un nuevo horizonte para la filosofía experimental del lenguaje. Revista de Humanidades de Valparaíso, 21, 107-128. https://doi.org/10.22370/rhv2023iss21pp107-128
Braisby, N., Franks, B., & Hampton, J. (1996). Essentialism, word use, and concepts. Cognition, 59, 247-274. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(95)00698-2
Brogaard, B. (2014). Intuitions as intellectual seemings. Analytic Philosophy, 55(4), 382-393. https://doi.org/10.1111/phib.12051
Cappelen, H. (2012). Philosophy without intuitions. Oxford University Press.
Caton, J. N. (2020). Using linguistic corpora as a philosophical tool. Metaphilosophy, 51(1), 51-70. https://doi.org/10.1111/meta.12405
Chudnoff, E. (2011). What Intuitions Are Like? Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, LXXXII(3), 625-654. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1933-1592.2010.00463.x
Del Pinal, G. & Reuter, K. (2017). Dual character concepts in social cognition: Commitments and the normative dimension of conceptual representation. Cognitive Science, 41(S3), 477-501. https://doi.org/10.1111/cogs.12456
Devitt, M. (2006). Intuitions In Linguistics. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 57, 481-513. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjps/axl017
Deutsch, M. (2009). Experimental philosophy and the theory of reference. Mind & Language, 24(4), 445-466. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0017.2009.01370.x
Deutsch, M. (2010). Intuitions, Counter-Examples, and Experimental Philosophy. Review of Philosophy and Psychology, 1(3), 447-460. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13164-010-0033-0
Deutsch, M. (2015). The myth of the intuitive. Experimental Philosophy and Philosophical Method. The MIT Press.
Dinges, A. & Zakkou, J. (2020). A Direction Effect on Taste Predicates. Philosophers’ Imprint, 20(27), 1-22.
Earlenbaugh, J. & Molyneux, B. (2009). Intuitions Are Inclinations to Believe. Philosophical Studies, 145(1), 89-109. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-009-9388-4
Fernández Moreno, L. (2021a). Natural kind terms. In P. Stalmaszczyk (Ed.), The Cambridge Handbook of the Philosophy of Language (pp. 283-299). Cambridge University Press.
Fernández Moreno, L. (2021b). Language and metaphysics: the case of theoretical identities. Synthese, 198(Suppl 3), 831-848. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-017-1498-5
Goldman, A. I. (2007). Philosophical intuitions: Their target, their source and their epistemic status. Grazer Philosophische Studien, 4, 1-26. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789401204651_002
Häggqvist, S. & Wikforss, A. (2015). Experimental semantics: The case of natural kind terms. In J. Haukioja (Ed.), Advances in Experimental Philosophy of Language (pp. 109-138. Bloomsbury.
Hansen, N. & Chemla, E. (2015). Linguistic experiments and ordinary language philosophy. Ratio, 28(4), 422-445. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/rati.12112
Hansen, N. (2014). Contemporary ordinary language philosophy. Philosophy Compass, 9(8), 556-569. https://doi.org/10.1111/phc3.12152
Hansen, N. (2015). Experimental philosophy of language. In Oxford handbooks online. Oxford University Press.
Horvath, J. (2022). Mischaracterization reconsidered. Inquiry. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020174X.2021.2019894
Katz, J. & Salerno, J. (2017). Epistemic modal disagreement. Topoi, 36, 141-153. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11245-015-9363-y
Khoo, J. (2015). Modal disagreements. Inquiry, 58(5), 511-534. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020174X.2015.1033005
Kneer, M. (2018). The norm of assertion: Empirical data. Cognition, 177, 165-171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2018.03.020
Kneer, M. (2021). Predicates of personal taste: Empirical data. Synthese, 199, 6455-6471. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-021-03077-9
Knobe, J. & Nichols, S. (2007). An experimental philosophy manifesto. In J. Knobe, S. Nichols (Eds.), Experimental Philosophy (pp. 3-14). Oxford University Press.
Knobe, J. & Nichols, S. (2017). Experimental philosophy. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (Winter 2017 Edition). https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2017/entries/experimental-philosophy/
Knobe, J., Prasada, S. & Newman, G. E. (2013). Dual character concepts and the normative dimension of conceptual representation. Cognition, 127, 242-257. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2013.01.005
Knobe, J. & Yalcin, S. (2014). Epistemic modals and context: Experimental data. Semantics and Pragmatics, 7(10), 1-21. https://doi.org/10.3765/sp.7.10
Knobe, J. (2007). Experimental philosophy. Philosophy Compass, 2(1), 81-92. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-9991.2006.00050.x
Koopman, C. (2012). Pragmatist resources for experimental philosophy: Inquiry in place of intuition. The Journal of Speculative Philosophy, 26(1), 1-24. https://doi.org/10.5325/jspecphil.26.1.0001
Kornblith, H. (2014). Naturalism and intuitions. In A naturalistic epistemology: Selected papers (pp. 158-177). Oxford University Press.
Lasersohn, P. (2005). Context dependence, disagreement and predicates of personal taste. Linguistics and Philosophy, 28, 643-686. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10988-005-0596-x
Liao, S.-y., Meskin, A. & Knobe, J. (2020). Dual character art concepts. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly, 101(1), 102-128. https://doi.org/10.1111/papq.12301
MacFarlane, J. (2014). Assessment-Sensitivity: Relative Truth and its Applications. Oxford University Press.
Machery, E., Mallon, R., Nichols, S. & Stich, S. P. (2004). Semantics, cross-cultural style. Cognition, 92, (B1-B12). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2003.10.003
Machery, E., Sytsma, J. & Deutsch, M. (2015). Speaker’s Reference and Cross-Cultural Semantics. In A. Bianchi (Ed.), On reference (pp. 62-76). Oxford University Press.
Machery, E. (2012). Expertise and Intuitions about Reference. THEORIA. An International Journal for Theory, History and Foundations of Science, 27(1), 37-54.
Mallon, R., Machery, E., Nichols, S. & Stich, S. P. (2009). Against arguments from reference. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 79(2), 332-356. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1933-1592.2009.00281.x
Marques, T. (2018). Retractions. Synthese, 195(8), 3335–3359. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-015-0852-8
Marsili, N. & Wiegmann, A. (2021). Should I say that? An experimental investigation of the norm of assertion. Cognition, 212, 104657. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2021.104657
Martí, G. (2009). Against Semantic Multi-Culturalism. Analysis, 69(1), 42-48. https://doi.org/10.1093/analys/ann007
Maynes, J. (2012). Linguistic Intuition and Calibration. Linguistics and Philosophy, 35, 443-460. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10988-012-9122-0
Maynes, J. & Gross, S. (2013). Linguistic intuitions. Philosophy Compass, 8(8), 714-730. https://doi.org/10.1111/phc3.12052
Molyneux, B. (2014). New arguments that philosophers don’t treat intuitions as evidence. Metaphilosophy, 45(3), 441-461. https://doi.org/10.1111/meta.12094
Nadelhoffer, T. & Nahmias, E. (2007). The Past and Future of Experimental Philosophy. Philosophical Explorations, 10(2), 123-149. https://doi.org/10.1080/13869790701305921
Nado, J. (2016). The intuition deniers. Philosophical Studies, 173(3), 781-800. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-015-0519-9
Rose, D. & Danks, D. (2013). In defense of a broad conception of experimental philosophy. Metaphilosophy, 44(4), 512-532. https://doi.org/10.1111/meta.12045
Sękowski, K. (2022). Concept Revision, Concept Application and the Role of Intuitions in Gettier Cases. Episteme, 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1017/epi.2022.49
Sosa, E. (1996). Rational Intuition: Bealer on Its Nature and Epistemic Status. Philosophical Studies, 81(2-3), 151-162. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00372779
Sosa, E. (2007). Intuitions: Their Nature and Epistemic Efficacy. Grazer Philosophische Studien, 74(1), 51-67. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789401204651_004
Stojanovic, I. (2007). Talking about taste: Disagreement, implicit arguments, and relative truth. Linguistics and philosophy, 30(6), 691-706. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10988-008-9030-5
Sytsma, J. & Livengood, J. (2011). A New Perspective Concerning Experiments on Semantic Intuitions. Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 89(2), 315-332. https://doi.org/10.1080/00048401003639832
Tallant, J. & Andow, J. (2020). English language and philosophy. In S. Adolphs, D. Knight (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of English language and digital humanities (pp. 440-455). Routledge.
Turri, J. (2013). The test of truth: An experimental investigation of the norm of assertion. Cognition, 129(2), 279-291. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2013.06.012
Weinberg, J. M. (2007). How to challenge intuitions empirically without risking skepticism. Midwest Studies in Philosophy, 31, 318-343. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-4975.2007.00157.x
Williamson, T. (2007). The philosophy of philosophy. Blackwell Publishing.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication, with the work after publication simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 International) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).