Biological organisms or Darwinian individuals?
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22370/rhv2024iss27pp1-18Keywords:
organism, darwinian individual, reductionism, life, evolutionAbstract
Traditionally, it has been supposed that the central object of Biology are ‘organisms’. The expression “organism” is relatively recent in the use that it has nowadays –it was introduced by the authors of the German Idealism– but corresponds to a very traditional notion. An ‘organism’ is a substance composed by a plurality of materials organized by the same substance that acts upon itself to persist in time, in order to a finality that is the organism itself. To make intelligible an organism seems indispensable its order to an end. This teleological perspective, nevertheless, is unacceptable for the reductivist perspective of Biology, prevalent since the triumph of what has been called the “Modern Synthesis” the first half of last century. It has been proposed, for that reason, to substitute the traditional idea of ‘organism’ by that of ‘Darwinian individual’ (cf. Godfrey-Smith, 2009), that could offer a more adequate perspective of the object of Biology. The object of this science could not be organisms, but individuals that can enter the Darwinian evolutionary drift. In this work it is explained why a hiatus persists between organisms teleologically oriented and a Darwinian individual. The Darwinian perspective leaves aside the central character of the object of Biology: life.
References
Aristóteles (1994). Metafísica. Gredos.
Aristóteles (1995). Física. Gredos.
Aristóteles (2008). Categorías. Sobre la interpretación. Losada.
Aristóteles (2010). Acerca del alma. Gredos.
Cheung, T. (2010). What is an Organism? On the Occurrence of a New Term and its Conceptual Transformations 1680-1850. History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences, 32(2/3), 155-194.
Clarke, E. (2010). The Problem of Biological Individuality. Biological Theory, 5(4), 312-325.
Clarke, E. (2013). The Multiple Realizability of Biological Individuals. The Journal of Philosophy, 110(8), 413-435.
Depew, D. J. (2017). Natural Selection, Adaptation, and the Recovery of Development. En P. Huneman & D. Walsh (Eds.), Challenging the Modern Synthesis: Adaptation, Development, and Inheritance (pp. 37-67). Oxford Academic. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780199377176.003.0001
Dupré, J, & Nicholson, D. J. (2018). A Manifesto for a Processual Philosophy of Biology. En D. J. Nicholson & J. Dupré (Eds.), Everything Flows. Towards a Processual Philosophy of Biology (pp. 3-45). Oxford University Press.
Dupré, J. (2021). The Metaphysics of Biology. Cambridge University Press.
Feser, E. (2019). Aristotle’s Revenge. The Metaphysical Foundations of Physical and Biological Science, Neuenkirchen-Seelscheid: Editiones Scholasticae.
Godfrey-Smith, P. (2009). Darwinian Populations and Natural Selection. Oxford University Press.
Godfrey-Smith, P. (2011). Darwinian Populations and Transitions in Individuality. En B. Brett Calcott & K. Sterelny (Eds.), The Major Transitions in Evolution Revisited (pp. 65-81). MIT Press.
Godfrey-Smith, P. (2013). Darwinian Individuals. En F. Bouchard & P. Huneman (Eds.), From Groups to Individuals. Evolution and Emerging Individuality (pp. 17-36). MIT Press.
Huneman, P. & Walsh, D. (2017b). Introduction: Challenging the Modern Synthesis. En Huneman, P. & Walsh, D. M. (Eds.), Challenging the Modern Synthesis. Adaptation, Development, and Inheritance (pp. 1-36). Oxford University Press.
Huneman, P. & Walsh, D. (Eds.) (2017). Challenging the Modern Synthesis: Adaptation, Development, and Inheritance. Oxford Academic.
Huneman, P. & Walsh, D. M. (Eds.) (2017a), Challenging the Modern Synthesis. Adaptation, Development, and Inheritance. Oxford University Press.
Immanuel Kant (1977). Crítica del juicio. Espasa Calpe.
Lewontin, R. (1970). The Units of Selection. Annual Reviews of Ecology and Systematics, 1, 1-18.
Lidgard, S. & Nyhart, L. (2017b). The Work of Biological Individuality: Concepts and Contexts. En S. Lidgard & L. K. Nyhart (Eds.), Biological Individuality. Integrating Scientific, Philosophical, and Historical Perspectives. (pp. 17-62). University of Chicago Press.
Lidgard, S. & Nyhart, L. K. (Eds.) (2017a). Biological Individuality. Integrating Scientific, Philosophical, and Historical Perspectives. University of Chicago Press.
Luisi, P. L. (2006). The Emergence of Life. From Chemical Origins to Synthetic Biology. Cambridge University Press.
Maturana, H. & Varela, F. (1994). De máquinas y seres vivos. Autopoiesis: la organización de lo vivo. Editorial Universitaria.
Meincke, A. S. & Dupré, J. (Eds.) (2021). Biological Individuality. Perspectives from Metaphysics and the Philosophy of Biology. Routledge.
Mix, L. J. (2018). Life Concepts from Aristotle to Darwin. On Vegetable Souls. Palgrave Macmillan.
Moreno, A. & Mossio, M. (2015). Biological Autonomy. A Philosophical and Theoretical Enquiry. Springer.
Nicholson, D. J. (2014b). The Return of the Organism as a Fundamental Explanatory Concept in Biology. Philosophy Compass, 9(5), 347-359.
Nicholson, D. J. (2018). Reconceptualizing the Organism: From Complex Machine to Flowing Stream. En D. J. Nicholson & J. Dupré (Eds.), Everything Flows. Towards a Processual Philosophy of Biology (pp. 139-166). Oxford University Press.
Nicholson, D. J. & Dupré, J. (Eds.) (2018). Everything Flows. Towards a Processual Philosophy of Biology. Oxford University Press.
Oderberg, D. S. (2007). Real Essentialism. Routledge.
Oderberg, D. S. (2013). Synthetic Life and the Bruteness of Immanent Causation. En Edward Feser (Ed.), Aristotle on Method and Metaphysics (pp. 206-235). Palgrave Macmillan.
Oderberg, D. S. (2018). The Great Unifier. Form and the Unity of the Organism. En W. M. R. Simpson, R. C. Koons, & N. J. Teh (Eds.), Neo-Aristotelian Perspectives on Contemporary Science (pp. 211-234). Routledge.
Oderberg, D. S. (2021). Siphonophores: A Metaphysical Case Study. En A. S. Meincke & J. Dupré (Eds.), Biological Individuality. Perspectives from Metaphysics and the Philosophy of Biology (pp. 22-39). Routledge.
Pepper, J. W. & Herron, M. D. (2008). Does Biology Need an Organism Concept? Biological Reviews 83, 621-627.
Pradeu, T. (2010). What is an Organism? An Immunological Answer. History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences, 32, 247-267.
Pradeu, T. (2012). The Limits of the Self. Immunology and Biological Identity. Oxford Unive& P. Huneman (Eds.), From Groups to Individuals. Evolution and Emerging Individuality (pp. 77-96). MIT Press.
Pradeu, T. (2018). Genidentity and Biological Processes. En D. J. Nicholson & J. Dupré (Eds.), Everything Flows. Towards a Processual Philosophy of Biology (pp. 96-112). Oxford University Press.
Reiss, M. J. & Ruse, M. (2023). The New Biology. A Battle between Mechanism and Organicism. Harvard University Press.
Ruiz-Mirazo, K., Etxeberria, A., Moreno, A., & Ibáñez, J. (2000). Organisms and their Place in Biology. Theory in Biosciences, 119, 209-233.
Ruiz-Mirazo, K., Peretó, J., & Moreno, A. (2004). A Universal Definition of Life: Autonomy and Open-Ended Evolution. Origins of Life and the Evolution of Biosphere, 34, 323-346.
Ruse, M. (1989). Do Organisms Exist? American Zoologist, 29(3), 1061-1066.
Schrödinger, E. (1967). What is Life? The Physical Aspect of the Living Cell. With Mind and Matter and Autobiographical Sketches. Cambridge University Press.
Wiggins, D. (2001). Sameness and Substance Renewed. Cambridge University Press.
Wiggins, D. (2016). Activity, Process, Continuant, Substance, Organism. Philosophy, 91, 268-280.
Wilson, J. (1999). Biological Individuals. The Identity and Persistence of Living Entities. Cambridge University Press.
Wilson, J. (2000). Ontological Butchery: Organism Concepts and Biological Generalizations. Philosophy of Science, 67, S301-S311.
Wilson, R. A. (2005). Genes and the Agents of Life. The Individual in the Fragile Sciences. Cambridge University Press.
Wilson, R. A. & Barker, M. J. (2019). Biological Individuals. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/biology-individual
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication, with the work after publication simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 International) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
