The Resistance of Friendship: Sigmund Freud, Laurence Rickels, and Sean Baker

Authors

  • Brian Willems Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22370/rhv2023iss23pp129-141

Keywords:

friendship, Sean Baker, Sigmund Freud, Laurence Rickels, crypt

Abstract

In the Nichomachean Ethics, Aristotle defines three kinds of friendship: utility, pleasure, and virtue. The characters in the films of Sean Baker fit into none of these categories. Friendship is central to all of Baker’s films, but it takes the non-Aristotelian form of “friends, no matter what,” which I interpret as a description of the aporia of friendship, of an impossible friend, or a friend in the realm of fantasy. In other words, friends are only friends when they resist everything friends are supposed to do. Betrayal, lies, and complications sit at the heart of this new definition. One mechanism for this kind of friendship is mourning. Friends are only friends when friendship is mourned, or when it is part of a crypt, or a vault for losses that are too traumatic to confront fully, as set out in the work of Sigmund Freud, Jacques Derrida, Nicolas Abraham and Mária Török, and developed by Laurence Rickels. This reading of mourning puts a particular spin on fantasy, for if fantasy is generally assumed to be about wish-fulfillment, then when fantasy reaches into the crypt for inspiration, it is retooled into a vehicle for confronting what is too hard to face. This is the function of friendship in Baker’s films: his friends are Judas figures going against their friends in order to keep their friendship alive. In Tangerine (2015), two transgender sex workers in West Hollywood develop their friendship around a fight over a man. In Starlet (2012), a young woman hides a secret from her elderly female friend, and this friendship is only saved when another actress betrays this secret. In these films, friendship is paradoxically formed by attempting to ruin friendship. Thought on fantasy and mourning will help in defining this type of non-Aristotelian friendship, as well as Freud’s work on the “ambivalence of feeling” from his writing on the First World War.

References

Abraham, N., & Török, M. (1986). The Wolf Man’s Magic Word: A Cryptonymy. University of Minnesota Press.

Aristotle (1999). Nicomanchean Ethics. Hackett Publishing.

Baker, S. (Dir.) (2012). Starlet. Maybach and Cunningham Productions, DVD.

Baker, S. (Dir.) (2015). Tangerine. Duplass Brothers Productions, DVD.

Cocking, D. (2014). Aristotle, Friendship and Virtue. Revue Internationale de Philosophie, 267(1), 83-90.

Crank, J. (2015). Interview: Sean Baker. Film Comment. https://www.filmcomment.com/blog/interview-sean-baker/

Derrida, J. (2020). The Politics of Friendship. Verso.

Derrida, J. (1998). Resistances of Psychoanalysis. Stanford University Press.

Freud, S. (1959). Creative Writers and Day-Dreaming. The Standard Edition of the Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud, Volume IX (1906-1908). Hogarth Press and the Institute of Psycho-Analysis.

Freud, S. (1961). A Note Upon the ‘Mystic Writing Pad.’ In The Standard Edition of the Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud, Volume XIX (1923-1925) (pp. 226-232). Edited by James Strachey. Hogarth Press and the Institute of Psycho-Analysis.

Freud, S. (1957). Thoughts for the Times on War and Death. In The Standard Edition of the Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud, Volume XIV (1914-1916) (pp. 274-300). Edited by James Strachey. Hogarth Press and the Institute of Psycho-Analysis.

Kasser, R., Meyer, M., & Wurst, G. (2006). The Gospel of Judas: From Codex Tchacos. National Geographic Society.

Miéville, C. (2009). Cognition as Ideology: A Dialectic of SF Theory. In M. Bould & China Miéville (Eds.), Red Planets: Marxist and Science Fiction (pp. 231-248). Wesleyan University Press.

Rieder, J. (2010). On Defining SF, or Not: Genre Theory, SF, and History. Science Fiction Studies, 37(2), 191-209.

Rickels, L. (2020a). Critique of Fantasy, Vol. 1: Between a Crypt and a Datemark. Punctum Books.

Rickels, L. (2020b). Critique of Fantasy, Vol. 2: The Contest Between B-Genres. Punctum Books.

Rickels, L. (2021). Critique of Fantasy, Vol. 3: The Block of Fame. Punctum Books.

Scott, J. (2001). Fantasy Echo: History and the Construction of Identity. Critical Inquiry, 27(2), 284-304.

Sherman, N. (1993). Aristotle on the Shared Life. In N. Kapur Badhwar (Ed.), Friendship: A Philosophical Reader (pp. 91-107). Cornell University Press.

Tolkien, J. R. R. (2008) Tolkien on Fairy-Stories: Expanded Edition, with Commentary and Notes. HarperCollinsPublishers.

Walker, A. D. M (1979). Aristotle’s Account of Friendship in the ‘Nicomanchean Ethics.’ Phronesis, 24(2), 180-196.

Westkott, M. (1977). Dialectics of Fantasy. Frontiers, 2(3), 1-7.

Willems, B. (2017). Speculative Realism and Science Fiction. Edinburgh University Press.

Winnicott, D. W. (2017). The Collected Works of D.W. Winnicott, Volume 9, 1969-1971. Oxford University Press.

Žižek, S. (2004). Organs Without Bodies: On Deleuze and Consequences. Routledge.

Žižek, S. (2003). The Puppet and the Dwarf: The Perverse Core of Christianity. MIT Press.

Downloads

Published

2023-12-26

How to Cite

Willems, B. (2023). The Resistance of Friendship: Sigmund Freud, Laurence Rickels, and Sean Baker. Revista De Humanidades De Valparaíso, (23), 129–141. https://doi.org/10.22370/rhv2023iss23pp129-141

Issue

No. 23 (2023)

Section

Monographic Section

License

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication, with the work after publication simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 International) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).