Freedom, History and the Subject of the Unconscious. Theoretical Contributions to the Ideological Study
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22370/rhv2023iss23pp69-89Keywords:
unconscious, ideology, freedom, history, traumaAbstract
In this article we address the notions of freedom, history and subjectivity, in order make an original contribution to the studies of ideology. Our methodology will consist in crossing Freudian-Lacanian psychoanalysis and the theory of interpellation of Louis Althusser. In the introduction, we start by exposing two major critiques of Freudian psychoanalysis, one formulated by Jean-Paul Sartre, and the other by Gilles Deleuze and Félix Guattari, thus shedding the light on how the psychoanalysis could represent (despite those critical arguments), a field of freedom rather than determinism, and a domain which is inherently historical, rather than the opposite. In the first section, will look closer at the notions of freedom, memory and history, advancing a preliminary hypothesis according to which within the symbolic space, the past remains open to changes – which will make both ideology and freedom possible. Moreover, we will see what aspects of freedom could be found within the Althusserian theory of interpellation, and how Lacanian psychoanalysis is compatible with it or can lead us beyond its limitations. In the second section, we will see how there can be a subject that precedes subjectivation, and how Lacan’s theory of subject which arises from the traumatic remainder, surpasses the scope of the theory of interpellation. The third section will address the pulse-traumatic core of the subject, such as it is conceived by Freud, not only as a determining dimension of the individual psyche, but as a structural condition of culture. Via these considerations, we will show how psychoanalysis can provide an explanation of the foundations of ideology, by conceiving the pulse-traumatic core of law that resides in the Name-of-Father. In the conclusion, we will see, through a series of examples, how ideology appears in the guise of truth, and why the psychoanalytic understanding of the unconscious is necessary for debunking the illusions it produces.
References
Althusser, L. (1984). Ideology and Ideological State Apparatuses. In Essays in Ideology. Verso.
Althusser, L. (2014). On the reproduction of capitalism: ideology and ideological state apparatuses. Verso.
Althusser, L., & Navarro, F. (1994). Lettres de Louis Althusser à Fernanda Navarro à propos de l’édition de Philosophie et marxisme, précédées d’une lettre à Mauricio Malamud (1984-1987). In Sur la philosophie. Gallimard.
Cabestan, P. (2005). Sartre and Psychoanalysis: Blindness or Insight? Cités, 22(2), 99-110. https://www.cairn.info/revue-cites-2005-2-page-99.htm
Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (1973). Capitalisme et schizophrénie 1 L: L’Anti-Œdipe. Les Éditions de Minuit.
Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (2007). El Antiedipo. Capitalismo y esquizofrenia. Paidós.
Deleuze, G. (1995). Negotiations 1972-1990. Columbia University Press.
Dolar, M. (1993). Beyond Interpellation. Qui Parle, 6(2), 75-96. http://www.jstor.org/stable/20685977a
Eagleton, T. (1994). Ideology and its vicissitudes in Western Marxism. In S. Žižek (Ed.), Mapping ideology (pp. 179-226). Verso.
Egnor, M. (2021). Does Superdeterminism resolve Dilemmas Around Free Will? https://mindmatters.ai/2021/12/does-superdeterminism-resolve-dilemmas-around-free-will/
Esposito, R. (1998). Categorías de lo impolítico. Katz.
Freud, S. (1992). El malestar en la cultura. In Obras completas Sigmund Freud, Volumen XXI (1927-1931), El porvenir de una ilusión. El malestar en la cultura y otras obras. Amorrortu Editores.
Heidegger, M. (2017). Zollikoner Seminare. Vittorio Klostermann.
Hyppolite, J. (1971). Figures de la pensée philosophique I. Presses Universitaires de France.
Lacan, J. (1960). Subversión del sujeto y dialéctica del deseo en el inconsciente freudiano. En Escritos 2 (pp. 755-788). Siglo XXI.
Lacan, J. (1963-1964). El seminario. Libro 11: Los cuatro conceptos fundamentales del psicoanálisis. Paidós.
Lacan, J. (1966a). Propos sur la causalite psychique (1946). In Ecrits. Seuil.
Lacan, J. (1968-1969). El seminario. Libro 16: De un Otro al otro. Paidós.
Lacan, J. (2008). El seminario de Jacques Lacan. Libro 2: el yo en la teoría de Freud y en la técnica psicoanalítica. Paidós.
Lacan, J. (2010). El Seminario de Jacques Lacan: Libro XX: Aún. Paidós.
Lacan, J. (2010a). El seminario de Jacques Lacan. Libro 11: los cuatro conceptos fundamentales del psicoanálisis. Paidós.
Sartre, J-P. (1943). Being and Nothingness. Editions Gallimard.
Sartre, J.-P. (1972). Situations IX, Mélanges. Gallimard.
Sicat, L. (1976). Political Socialization in the Philippines Today: An Empirical Study: Discussion. Philippine Political Science Journal, 3(3), 135-139, https://doi.org/10.1080/01154451.1976.9753932
Soler, C. (2014). La repetición en la experiencia analítica. Manantial.
Skott-Myhre, H. (2015). Marx, Ideology and the Unconscious. Annual Review of Critical Psychology, 12, 59-65.
Strathausen, C. (1994). Althusser’s Mirror. Studies in 20th Century Literature, 18(1). https://doi.org/10.4148/2334-4415.1339
Eliot, T. S. (1922). Tradition and the Individual Talent. Originally published in The Sacred Wood: Essays on Poetry and Criticism.
Tomès, A. (2013). La critique sartrienne de l’inconscient. Les temps modernes, (674-675), 51-67.
Žižek, S. (1994). The Spectre of Ideology. In Mapping Ideology, ed. Slavoj Žižek. Verso.
Žižek, S. (1998). Porque no saben lo que hacen. El goce como un factor político. Paidós.
Žižek, S. (2006). The Metastases of Enjoyment. Six essays on women and Causality. Verso.
Žižek, S. (2008). Cómo leer a Lacan. Paidós.
Žižek, S. (2009). El sublime objeto de la ideología. Siglo XXI.
Žižek, S. (2016). Subject before subjectivation. Filozofski Vestnik, 9(1). https://ojs.zrc-sazu.si/filozofski-vestnik/article/view/3584
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication, with the work after publication simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 International) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
