Open Naturalism and Two Types of Intuition
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22370/rhv2024iss24pp25-43Keywords:
realism, representation, phenomenon, naturalism, ontologyAbstract
As a non-representationalist form of integrating methodological naturalism with ontological naturalism, this work proposes a distinction between phenomenic and rational intuitions. Since this is not a static distinction, it offers a way of observing in which sense the apparent circularity between mental and theoretical representations is not a vicious one. The argument’s plausibility will have to be reinforced through considerations about the unstability of ontologies and about how to conceive conflicting intuitions.
References
Alchourrón, C. E., Gärdenfors, P., & Makinson, D. (1985). On the logic of theory change: Partial meet contraction and revision functions. The journal of symbolic logic, 50(2), 510-530. https://doi.org/10.2307/2274239
Bealer, G. (1999). A Theory of the A Priori. Philosophical perspectives, 13, 29-55.
Bengson, J. (2015). The intellectual given. Mind, 124(495), 707-760. https://doi.org/10.1093/mind/fzv029
Berghofer, P. (2022). The Justificatory Force of Experiences. Springer.
Bayne, T. & Montague, M. (Eds.). (2011). Cognitive phenomenology. Oxford University Press.
Bunge, M. (1980/2002). Epistemología: curso de actualización. Siglo XXI.
Evans, G. (1982). The Varieties of Reference. Oxford University Press.
Fuhrmann, A. (1997). Everything in flux. In S. Lindström, R. Sliwinski, & J. Österberg (Eds.), Odds and Ends: Philosophical Essays Dedicated to Wlodek Rabinowicz on the occasion of his fiftieth birthday (pp. 111-125). Uppsala University.
García-Arnaldos, María D. (2018). ¿Intuición o confianza racional? Quaderns de filosofía, 5(2), 49-71.
Hoyningen-Huene, P. (2013). Systematicity: The Nature of Science. Oxford University Press.
Huemer, M. (2006). Phenomenal Conservatism and the Internalist Intuition. American Philosophical Quarterly, 43(2),147-158. https://www.jstor.org/stable/20010233
Ladyman, J. (2000). What’s really wrong with constructive empiricism? Van Fraassen and the metaphysics of modality. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 51(4), 837-856. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjps/51.4.837
Machery, E., Mallon, R., Nichols, S., & Stich, S. P. (2013). If folk intuitions vary, then what? Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 86(3), 618-635. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1933-1592.2011.00555.x
Markie, P. J. (2013). Rational intuition and understanding. Philosophical studies, 163(1). 271-290. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-011-9815-1
Mazzieri, M. & Dragoni, A. F. (2007). Ontology revision as non-prioritized belief revision. En ESOE’07: Proceedings of the First International Conference on Emergent Semantics and Ontology Evolution (pp. 58-69). CEUR-WS.org
Mazzieri, M. & Dragoni, A. F. (2012). Ontology evolution: How an ontology can change, and how to manage inconsistency. In G. Minati, M. Abram, & E. Pessa (Eds.), Methods, models, simulations and approaches towards a general theory of change (pp. 147-160). https://doi.org/10.1142/9789814383332_0010
McDowell, J. (1984). De re senses. Philosophical Quarterly, 34(136), 283-294. https://doi.org/10.2307/2218761
Ovejero, F. (2021). Estrategias naturalistas en teoría social. En R. López-Orellana & E. J. Suárez-Ruíz (Eds.), Filosofía posdarwiniana: Enfoques actuales sobre la intersección entre análisis epistemológico y naturalismo filosófico (pp. 239-265). College Publications.
Pérez, D. I. & Gomila, A. (2021). Social cognition and the second person in human interaction. Routledge.
Price, H. (2013). Naturalism without representationalism. In Macarthur de Caro (Eds.), Naturalism in Question. Harvard University Press.
Psillos, S. (2006). The Structure, the Whole Structure, and Nothing but the Structure? Philosophy of Science, 73(5). 560-570. https://doi.org/10.1086/518326
Rescher, N. & González, W. J. (1999). Razón y valores en la era científico-tecnológica. Paidós.
Sankey, H. (2009). Scientific realism and the semantic incommensurability thesis. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, Part A, 40(2), 196-202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsa.2009.03.007
Schaffer, J. (2009). On what grounds what. In D. J. Chalmers, D. Manley, & R. Wasserman (Eds.), Metametaphysics: New Essays on the Foundations of Ontology (pp. 347-383). Oxford University Press.
Sosa, E. (1998). Minimal Intuition. In M. DePaul & W. Ramsay (Eds.), Rethinking Intuition: The Psychology of Intuition and Its Role in Philosophical Inquiry (pp. 257-270). Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
Sosa, E. (2007). Experimental Philosophy and Philosophical Intuition. Philosophical Studies, 132(1), 99-107. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-006-9050-3
Spohn, Wolfgang (2012). The laws of belief: Ranking theory and its philosophical applications. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Tye, M. (1995). Ten Problems of Consciousness: A Representational Theory of the Phenomenal Mind. MIT Press.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Revista de Humanidades de Valparaíso y Universidad de Valparaíso
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication, with the work after publication simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 International) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).