Can Intuitions Justify Moral Claims?
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22370/rhv2024iss24pp105-123Keywords:
intuition, moral justification, moral epistemology, epistemic injusticeAbstract
In the last three decades of the twentieth century, many analytic philosophers turned to addressing questions of practical ethics, radically expanding the field of moral philosophy beyond the meta-ethical topics that had been its primary focus for most of the century. Yet addressing practical controversies quickly raised the question of how normative moral claims might be justified. Many analytic philosophers relied on intuitionism, which has a long pedigree in Anglophone moral philosophy. This paper assesses three ways in which twentieth analytic philosophers drew on intuitions to support or dispute moral claims. We argue that those methods failed in their aim of promoting trustworthy moral knowledge because they relied on assumptions that, when presumed in contexts of structural epistemic injustice, are systematically misleading. Even though intuitions are among the sources of knowledge on which moral agents should rely, moral epistemology must give careful attention to the social processes through which intuitions and other forms of evidence are gathered, refined, and assessed. Producing trustworthy moral knowledge requires democratic reasoning processes that are sensitive to the ubiquity of epistemic injustice and domination and develops strategies for countering these.
References
Adelberg, T., Thompson, M., & Nahmias, E. (2014). Do Men and Women Have Different Philosophical Intuitions? Further Data. Philosophical Psychology, 28(5), 615-641. https://doi.org/10.1080/09515089.2013.878834
Anderson, E. (1993). Value in Ethics and Economics. Harvard University Press.
Anderson, E. (2012) Epistemic Justice as a Virtue of Social Institutions. Social Epistemology: A Journal of Knowledge, Culture and Policy, 26(2), 163-173. https://doi.org/10.1080/02691728.2011.652211
Anderson, E. (2014). Social Movements, Experiments in Living, and Moral Progress: Case Studies from Britain’s Abolition of Slavery. University of Kansas.
Anderson, E. (2015). Moral Bias and Corrective Practices: A Pragmatist Perspective. Central APA Presidential Address, Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association, 89, 21-53.
Bealer, G. (1998). Intuition and the Autonomy of Philosophy. In M. R. Depaul, & W. Ramsey (Eds.), Rethinking Intuition: The Psychology of Intuition and Its Role in Philosophy Inquiry (pp. 201-239). Rowman and Littlefield.
Brandt, R. (1954). Hopi Ethics: A Theoretical Analysis. University of Chicago Press.
Brison, S. J. (2002). Aftermath: Violence and the Remaking of a Self. Princeton University Press.
Bordonaba-Plou, D., Fernández-Castro, V., & Torices, J. R. (2022). Analytic philosophy as philosophical activism. In D. Bordonaba-Plou, V. Fernández-Castro, & J. R. Torices (Eds.), The Political Turn in Analytic Philosophy: Reflections on Social Injustice and Oppression (pp. 3-29). De Gruyter.
Buckwalter, W., & Stich, S. (2014). Gender and Philosophical Intuition. In J. Knobe & S. Nichols (Eds.), Experimental Philosophy (Vol. 2, pp. 307-346). Oxford University Press.
Cappelen, H. (2012). Philosophy without Intuitions. Oxford University Press.
Chudnoff, E. (2013). Intuition. Oxford University Press.
Dewey, J., & Tufts, J. (1981). Ethics. Ed. J. A. Boydston, The Later Works, 1925–1953. Southern Illinois University Press.
Edmonds, D. (2014). Would You Kill the Fat Man? The Trolley Problem and What Your Answer Tells Us about Right and Wrong. Princeton University Press.
Foot, P. (1967). The Problem of Abortion and the Doctrine of the Double Effect. Oxford Review, 5, 5-15.
Fricker, M. (2007). Epistemic Injustice: Power and the Ethics of Knowing. Oxford University Press.
Gilligan, C. (1981-1982). In a Different Voice: Psychological Theory and Women’s Development. Harvard University
Habermas, J. (1990). Discourse Ethics: Notes on a Philosophical Program of Justification. In Moral Consciousness and Communicative Action, Trans. Christian Lenhardt and Sherry Weber Nicholsen. The MIT Press.
Haidt, J. (2001). The Emotional Dog and Its Rational Tail. Psychological Review, 108(4), 813-834. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.108.4.814
Hales, S. D. (2006). Relativism and the foundations of philosophy. The MIT Press.
Hauser, M. (2006). Moral Minds. Harper Collins.
Henrich, J., Heine, S. J., & Norenzayan, A. (2010). The Weirdest People in the World? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 33(2-3), 61-83. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X0999152X
Horvath, J. (2010). How (Not) to React to Experimental Philosophy. Philosophical Psychology, 23, 447-480. https://doi.org/10.1080/09515089.2010.505878
Jaggar, A. M. (1989). Love & Knowledge: Emotion in Feminist Epistemology. Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy, 32(2), 151-176. https://doi.org/10.1080/00201748908602185
Jaggar, A. M., & Tobin, T. W. (2013). Situating Moral Justification: Rethinking the Mission of Moral Epistemology. Metaphilosophy, 4(4), 383-408. https://doi.org/10.1111/meta.12048
Jaggar, A. M. (2019). Thinking about Justice in the Unjust Meantime. Feminist Philosophical Quarterly, 5(2). https://doi.org/10.5206/fpq/2019.2.7283
Jaggar, A. M., & Tobin, T. W. (2024). Moral justification and structural epistemic injustice. In J. Browne & M. McKeown (Eds.), What is Structural Injustice? Oxford University Press.
Kahneman, D. (2012). Thinking Fast and Slow. Penguin.
Keynes, J. M. (1949). Two memoirs: Dr Melchior: a defeated enemy and My early beliefs. Augusts M. Kelley.
Kitcher, P. (2001). Science, Truth and Democracy. Oxford University Press.
Ladd, J. (1957). The Structure of a Moral Code: A Philosophical Analysis of Ethical Discourse applied to the Ethics of the Navaho Indians. Harvard University Press.
Longino, H. E. (1990). Science as Social Knowledge: Values and Objectivity in Scientific Inquiry. Princeton University Press.
McCumber, J. (2001). Time in th Ditch: American Philosophy and the McCarthy Era. Northwestern University Press.
Mikhail, J. (2011). Elements of Moral Cognition. Cambridge University Press.
Mill, J. S. (1977). On Liberty. In J. M. Robson (Ed.), Collected Works of J. S. Mill (Vol. 18, pp. 260-267). University of Toronto Press.
Norcross, A. (2004). Puppies, Pigs, and People: Eating Meat and Marginal Cases. Ethics, 18(1), 229-245. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1520-8583.2004.00027.x
Nozick, R. (1989). The Examined Life: Philosophical Meditations. Simon and Schuster.
Pinedo, M., & Villanueva, N. (2022). Epistemic de-platforming. In D. Bordonaba-Plou, V. Fernández-Castro, & J. R. Torices (Eds.), The Political Turn in Analytic Philosophy: Reflections on Social Injustice and Oppression (pp. 105-134). De Gruyter.
Rawls, J. (1971). A Theory of Justice. Belknap Press.
Ross, W. D. (1930/2002). The Right and the Good. Oxford University Press.
Schwitzgebel, E., Cushman, F. (2012). Expertise in Moral Reasoning? Order Effects on moral Judgment in Professional Philosophers and Non-Philosophers. Mind and Language, 27(2), 135-153. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0017.2012.01438.x
Schwitzgebel, E., Kofi Bright, L., Dicey Jennings, C., Thompson, M., & Winsberg, E. (2021). The Diversity of Philosophy Students and Faculty in the United States. The Philosophers’ Magazine, 30. https://www.philosophersmag.com/essays/244-the-diversity-of-philosophy-students-and-faculty-in-the-united-states
Sidgwick, H. (1907/1962). The Methods of Ethics. Macmillan.
Singer, P. (1972). Moral Experts. Analysis, 32(4), 115-117. https://doi.org/10.1093/analys/32.4.115
Singer, P. (2005). Ethics and Intuitions. Journal of Ethics, 9(3/4), 331-352. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10892-005-3508-y
Stich, S., & Tobia, K. (2016). Experimental Philosophy and the Philosophical Tradition. In J. Sytsma & W. Buckwalter (Eds.), A Companion to Experimental Philosophy (pp, 3-21). John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Thomson, J. J. (1971). A Defense of Abortion. Philosophy & Public Affairs, 1(1), 47-66). https://www.jstor.org/stable/2265091
Tobin, T. W. (2011). The Relevance of Trust for Moral Justification. Social Theory and Practice, 37(4), 599-628. https://doi.org/10.5840/soctheorpract201137435
Tobin, T. W., & Jaggar, A. M. (2013). Naturalizing Moral Justification: Rethinking the Method of Moral Epistemology. Metaphilosophy, 4(4), 409-440. https://doi.org/10.1111/meta.12050
Walker, M. U. (2007). Moral Understandings: A Feminist Study in Ethics, 2/e. Oxford University Press.
Weinberg, J. M., Gonnerman, C., Buckner, C., & Alexander, J. (2010). Are philosophers expert intuiters? Philosophical Psychology, 23(3), 331-355. https://doi.org/10.1080/09515089.2010.490944
Williamson, T (2007). The philosophy of philosophy. Blackwell
Wisor, S. (2011). Against shallow ponds: an argument against Singer’s approach to global poverty. Journal of Global Ethics, 7(1), 19-32. https://doi.org/10.1080/17449626.2010.548819
Wylie, A. (2003). Why Standpoint Matters. In R. Figueroa & S. G. Harding ( Eds.), Science and Other Cultures: Issues in Philosophies of Science and Technology (pp. 26-48). Routledge.
Zhang, L., Reynolds Losin, E. A., Ashar, Y. K., Koban, L., & Wager, T. D. (2021). Gender Biases in Estimation of Others’ Pain. The Journal of Pain, 22(9), 1048-1059. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpain.2021.03.001
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Revista de Humanidades de Valparaíso y Universidad de Valparaíso
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication, with the work after publication simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 International) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
