What Neuroscience Tells Us About Mental Illness: Scientific Realism in the Biomedical Sciences
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22370/rhv2022iss20pp119-140Keywords:
philosophy of psychiatry, reductionism, medical nihilism, carte blanche realism, medical pragmatismAbstract
Our philosophical understanding of mental illness is being shaped by neuroscience. However, it has the paradoxical effect of igniting two radically opposed groups of philosophical views. On one side, skepticism and denialism assume that, lacking clear biological mechanisms and etiologies for most mental illnesses, we should infer they are constructions best explained by means of social factors. This is strongly associated with medical nihilism: it considers psychiatry more harmful than benign. On the other side of the divide, naturalism and reductionism are on the look for failures in the biological functioning of the organism whenever a genuine mental illness occurs. Psychiatry as currently practiced, accordingly, exhibits the gaps of an ongoing research programme; a yet to be completed neuroscience would link mental illnesses with identifiable biological mechanisms. Both sides of this divide claim to be fostered by scientific discoveries and advances in neuroscience, when taken at face value. Against this background, we argue instead for a modest view. To that end, we draw attention to some nuances in the scientific realism debate. While contending that neuroscientific theories and models aim to provide true representations of their target systems, and can justifiably claim to have attained some, we argue that our confidence should not be placed beforehand in specific features of these scientific representations. Hence, it would be unwarranted to extract morals for psychiatry from posits (or their absence) in neuroscientific explanations of mental illnesses. To illustrate our position, we examine some recent discoveries in neuroscience concerning bipolar disorder. We conclude by linking our topic to a broader issue in the philosophy of medicine: insofar as psychiatry is a biomedical specialty, its classifications of health and disease are guided by pragmatic concerns, as well as by scientific discoveries.
References
American Psychiatric Association (2022). Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. DSM-5-TR. Washington: American Psychiatric Association.
Bickle, J., Mandik, P., Landreth, A. (2019). The Philosophy of Neuroscience. In Zalta, Edward N. (Ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2019/entries/neuroscience/
Cryle, P., Stephens, E. (2017). Normality: A Critical Genealogy. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Curd, Martin & Tulodziecki, Dana (2020). Should We Trust What Our Scientific Theories Say? In K. McCain & K. Kampourakis (Eds.), What is Scientific Knowledge? An Introduction to Contemporary Epistemology of Science. New York: Routledge.
Engelhardt, H. Tristam, Jr. (1984). Clinical Problems and the Concept of Disease. In Nordenfelt, Lennart & B. Lindhal, Ingemar B. (Eds.), Health, Disease, and Causal Explanation, pp. 27-41. Dordrecht: D. Reidel.
Foucault, M. (1963). Naissance de la clinique. Paris: Presses universitaires de France.
Gensollen, M., Jiménez-Rolland, M. (2021). Giere’s Scientific Perspectivism as Carte Blanche Realism. ArtefaCToS. Revista de estudios de la ciencia y la tecnología, 10(1), 61-74. https://doi.org/10.14201/art20211016174
Goldsmith, J. (2020). A Failed Revolution in Mental Health. Health Affairs, 39(1), 165-166. https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.2019.01609
Gotzsche, P. (2013). Deadly Medicines and Organised Crime. London: Routledge.
Gouveia, S. S. (2022). Philosophy and Neuroscience. A Methodological Analysis. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.
Gräsbeck, R. (1984). Health and disease from the point of view of the clinical laboratory. In Nordenfelt, L., Lindhal, B., Ingemar, B. (Eds.), Health, Disease, and Causal Explanation, pp. 47-60. Dordrecht: D. Reidel.
Grene, M. (1977). Philosophy of medicine: Prolegomena to a philosophy of science. Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1976, (2), 77-93.
Harrington, A. (2019). Mind Fixers. Psychiatry’s Troubled Search for the Biology of Mental Illness. New York: W. W. Norton & Co.
Hoffman, G. A. (2109). “Aren’t Mental Disorders Just Chemical Imbalances?”, “Aren’t Mental Disorders Just Brain Dysfunctions?”, and Other Frequently Asked Questions about Mental Disorders. In Tekin, Ş., Bluhm, R. (Eds.), The Bloomsbury Companion to Philosophy of Psychiatry, pp. 59-91. New York: Bloomsbury Academic.
Hofmann, B. (2002). On the triad disease, illness, and sickness. The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy, 27(6), 651-673.
Hyman, S. E. (2007). Can Neuroscience be Integrated into the DSMV? Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 8(9), 725-732.
Insel, T. R. (2009). Translating Scientific Opportunity into Public Health Impact: A Strategic Plan for Research on Mental Illness. Archives of General Psychiatry, 66(2), 128-133.
King, L. S. (1954). What is disease. Philosophy of Science, 21(3), 193-203.
Middleton, H., Moncrieff, J. (2019). Critical Psychiatry: A Brief Overview. British Journal of Psychiatric Advances, 25(1), 47-54.
Morehead, Daniel (2022). The History of Psychiatry—A History of Failure? Psychiatric Times, 39(1). https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.2019.01609
Niiniluoto, I. (1993). The aim and structure of applied research. Erkenntnis, 38, 1-21.
Nordenfelt, L. (1987). On the Nature of Health. Dordrecht: Reidel.
Rather, L. J. (1959). Towards a philosophical study of the idea of disease. In Brooks, Chandler, M. & Cranefield, Paul, F. (Eds.), The Historical Development of Physiological Thought, pp. 353-373. New York: Hafner.
Ruhmkorff, S. (2013). Global and Local Pessimistic Meta-inductions. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science, 27(4), 409-428.
No Author(s) (1992). Neuroscience and Mental Illness. Science, 257(5078), 1867. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.257.5078.1867
Simon, H. (1969). The Sciences of the Artificial. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Simon, J. R. (2011). Medical ontology. In Gifford, Fred (Ed.), Philosophy of Medicine, pp. 65-114.Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Simon, J. R. (2017). Realism and constructivism in medicine. In Salomon, Miriam; Simon, Jeremy, R. & Kincaid, Harold (Eds.). The Routledge Companion to Philosophy of Medicine, pp. 90-100. New York: Routledge.
Stegenga, J. (2018). Medical Nihilism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Szasz, T. S. (1961). The Myth of Mental Illness: Foundations of a Theory of Personal Conduct. New York: Harper & Row.
Temkin, O. (1961). The scientific approach to disease. In Crombie, A.C. (Ed.), Scientific Change. pp. 629-647. Londres: Heinemann.
Thagard, P. (2008). Mental Illness from the Perspective of Theoretical Neuroscience. Perspectives in Biology and Medicine, 51(3), 335-352.
Tsou, J. Y. (2019). Philosophy of Science, Psychiatric Classification, and the DSM. In Tekin, Ş., Bluhm, R. (Eds.), The Bloomsbury Companion to Philosophy of Psychiatry, pp. 177-196. New York: Bloomsbury Academic.
Tsou, J. Y. (2021). Philosophy of Psychiatry. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Wakefield, J. C. (1992). Disorder as Harmful Dysfunction: A Conceptual Critique of DSM-III-R’s Definition of Mental Disorder. Psychological Review, 99(2), 232-247.
Wrigley, A. (2007). Realism and Anti-Realism about Mental Illness. Philosophical Papers, 36(3), 371-397.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Revista de Humanidades de Valparaíso y Universidad de Valparaíso
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication, with the work after publication simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 International) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
