Extended Subjectivity, Conveyance of Cognitions and Community of Minds: About the Possibility of One’s Reasons become other’s Intuitions
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22370/rhv2024iss24pp163-182Keywords:
holism, intuitive belief, extended cognition, intuitive assistant, extended reasonsAbstract
The holist and inferential condition that, according with Davidson, defines imperatively the cognitive process collides with the existence of the intuitive believes, that is to say, those believes that are of themselves the fundamentum and that, thus, don’t require other belief for their grounds. Nonetheless, if, for one part, is adopted the way in which Peirce understands the term “intuition” and, for another, is accepted the extension of inferential holism, is allowed, even so, to admit the existence of intuitive believes, without transgressing the Davidsonian prohibition. Indeed, if the inferential basis of supported belief is located beyond of the individual agency of who support that belief, the very belief would count as intuition of the agent and would respect the Davidsonian holist constraint, in the sense that such a belief would be a belief whose basis would be in another belief, even when that belief was one that was in an external agency. The key for to accomplish this purpose is to sustain a reasoning extended theory —analogous to the Clark and Chalmers (1998) extended theory of mind—, by virtue of which the agent can obtain, from an intuitive assistant —as alien inferential authorship — what he cannot get by his own inferential authorship. Precisely, in this work we will expound a Davidsonian type of linguistic interaction model —namely, dialogic and triangular—, for cognitions persuasive transfer, by means of one’s reasons (the assistant) become other’s intuitions (the assisted).
References
Amoretti, M. C., De Caro, M., & Ervas, F. (2017). One Hundred Years of Donald Davidson. Introduction. Argumenta, 3(1), 3-20. https://doi.org/10.14275/2465-2334/20175.AMO
Austin, J. L. (1961). Performative Utterances. En G. J. Warnock, J. O. Urmson (Eds.), Philosophical Papers (pp. 220-239). Oxford University Press.
Austin, J. L. (1962). How to do things with words. Oxford University Press.
Bengson, J. (2015). The Intellectual Given. Mind, 124(495), 707-760. https://doi.org/10.1093/mind/fzv029
Blanco, A. (2004a). Actos ilocucionarios explícitos. Revista de Filosofía, 29(1), 99-122.
Blanco, A. (2004b). Palabras al viento. Ensayo sobre la fuerza ilocucionaria. Trotta.
Broncano, F. (2007). Sujeto y subjetividad en la mente extensa. Revista de filosofía, 31(2), 109-133.
Carter, J. A., Kallestrup, J., Palermos, S. O., & Pritchard, D. (2014). Varieties of externalism. Philosophical Issues, 24(1), 63-109. https://doi.org/10.1111/phis.12026
Carter, J. A., Clark, A., Kallestrup, J., Palermos, S. O., & Pritchard, D. (Eds.) (2018). Socially Extended Epistemology. Oxford University Press.
Chalmers, D. (2008). Foreword. En A. Clark, Supersizing the Mind: Embodiment, Action, and Cognitive Extension (pp. ix-xvi). Oxford University Press.
Chudnoff, E. (2013). Intuition. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199683000.001.0001
Clark, A., & Chalmers, D. (1998). The Extended Mind. Analysis, 58(1), 7-19. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/8535.003.0002
Clark, A. (2008). Supersizing the Mind: Embodiment, Action, and Cognitive Extension. Oxford University Press.
Darwall, S. (2006). The Second-Person Standpoint: Morality, Respect, and Accountability. Harvard University Press.
Davidson, D. (1973). Radical Interpretation. En D. Davidson, The Essential Davidson, pp. 23-36. Oxford University Press.
Davidson, D. (1974). Belief and the Basis of Meaning. En D. Davidson, Inquiries into Truth and lnterpretation (pp. 141-154). Oxford University Press.
Davidson, D. (1975). Thought and Talk. En D. Davidson, Inquiries into Truth and lnterpretation (pp. 155-170). Clarendon Press.
Davidson, D. (1976). Reply to Fosler. En D. Davidson, Inquiries into Truth and lnterpretation (pp. 155-170). Clarendon Press.
Davidson, D. (1982). Communication and Convention. En D. Davidson, Inquiries into Truth and lnterpretation (pp. 265-280). Clarendon Press.
Davidson, D. (1984). Expressing Evaluations. En D. Davidson, Problems of Rationality (pp. 19-37). Clarendon Press.
Davidson, D. (1987). Knowing One’s Own Mind. En D. Davidson, Subjective, Intersubjective, Objective (pp. 15-38). Clarendon Press.
Davidson, D. (1988). The Myth of the Subjective. En D. Davidson, Subjective, Intersubjective, Objective (pp. 39-52). Clarendon Press.
Davidson, D. (1991). Inquiries into Truth and lnterpretation. Clarendon Press.
Davidson, D. (1992a). The Second Person. En D. Davidson, Subjective, Intersubjective, Objective (pp. 107-121). Clarendon Press.
Davidson, D. (1992b). Mente, mundo y acción. Claves para una interpretación. Paidós.
Davidson, D. (1994). Donald Davidson. En S. Guttenplan (Ed.), A Companion to the Philosophy of Mind (pp. 231-236). Blackwell.
Davidson, D. (2001a). Subjective, Intersubjective, Objective. Clarendon Press.
Davidson, D. (2001b). Externalisms. En P. Kotatko & P. Pagin, G. Segal (Eds.), Interpreting Davidson (pp. 1-16). CSLI Publications.
Davidson, D. (2004). Problems of Rationality. Clarendon Press.
Davidson, D. (2005). Truth, Language, and History. Clarendon Press.
Earlenbaugh, J. & Molyneux, B. (2009). Intuitions Are Inclinations to Believe. Philosophical Studies, 145(1), 89-109. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-009-9388-4
Gomila, A. (2008). La relevancia moral de la perspectiva de segunda persona. En D. Pérez & L. Fernández (Comps.), Cuestiones filosóficas: ensayos en honor de Eduardo Rabossi, pp. 493-510. Catálogos.
Gomila, A. (2001). La perspectiva de segunda persona: mecanismos mentales de la intersubjetividad. Contrastes, 6, 65-86. https://doi.org/10.24310/Contrastescontrastes.v0i0.1448
Grice, H. P. (1969). Utterer’s meaning and intentions. Philosophical Review, 78(2), 147-177. https://doi.org/10.2307/2184179
Guttenplan, S. (Ed.) (1996). A Companion to the Philosophy of Mind. Blackwell.
Hutto, D. & Satne, G. (2017). Demystifying Davidson: Radical Interpretation meets Radical Enactivism. Argumenta, 3(1), 127-144. http://dx.doi.org/10.14275/2465-2334/20175.HUT
Koksvik, O. (2017). The Phenomenology of Intuition. Philosophy Compass, 12(1), e12387. https://doi.org/10.1111/phc3.12387
Kotatko, P., Pagin, P., & Segal, G. (Eds.) (2001). Interpreting Davidson. CSLI Publications.
Moya, C. (1992). Introducción a la filosofía de Davidson: mente, mundo y acción. En D. Davidson, Mente, mundo y acción. Claves para una interpretación (pp. 9-45). Paidós.
Peirce, C. S. (1868). Questions concerning certain faculties claimed for man. The Journal of Speculative Philosophy, 2(2), 103-114. http://www.jstor.org/stable/25665643
Pérez, D. & Fernández, L. (Comps.) (2008). Cuestiones filosóficas. Ensayos en honor de Eduardo Rabossi. Catálogos.
Pérez, D. & Lawler, D. (Comps.) (2017). La segunda persona y las emociones. SADAF.
Pérez, D. & Gomila, A. (2022). Social Cognition and the Second Person in Human Interaction. Routledge.
Scotto, C. (2002). Interacción y atribución mental: La perspectiva de la segunda persona. Análisis Filosófico, 22(2), 135-151.
Sosa, E. (1996). Rational Intuition: Bealer on Its Nature and Epistemic Status. Philosophical Studies, 81(2-3), 151-162.
Tindale, C. (2017). Retórica y teoría de la argumentación contemporánea: ensayos escogidos de Christopher Tindale. EAFIT.
Van Inwagen, P. (1997). Materialism and the Psychological-Continuity Account of Personal Identity. Noûs, 31(11), 305-319. https://doi.org/10.1111/0029-4624.31.s11.14
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication, with the work after publication simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 International) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
