In Favour of a Dialogue Between Neurosciences and Normative Ethics: Moral Enhancement via Sprayed Oxitocine?

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22370/rhv2022iss20pp57-75

Keywords:

oxytocin, normative ethics, neuroethics, moral enhancement, practical philosophy, moral reasoning

Abstract

In this paper we argue that there should be a relationship of dialogue (excluding subordination and independence) between neurosciences and normative ethics. Our main argument is based on the fact that knowledge from neuroscience (and, in particular, studies on the causal role of oxytocin in human behavior) can explain and give content to some motivational and psychological limits that would modify moral demands on individuals. We show that in the face of a hypothetical case proposing moral enhancement through the application of aerosolized oxytocin, neuroethical arguments alone are insufficient to determine its moral permissibility or impermissibility. Furthermore, we argue that it is also not possible to establish the superiority of normative arguments, since neuroscience insights are more effective in modifying behaviors constrained by our own physical and neurological constitution. We conclude that both serve to make decisions, both individually and collectively, to try to better accommodate our attitudes and behaviors to what we consider morally right to do.

References

Abu-Akel, A., Palgi, S., Klein, E., Decety, J., Shamay-Tsoory, S. (2015). Oxytocin increases empathy to pain when adopting the other- but not the self-perspective. Social Neuroscience, 10(1), 7-15. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470919.2014.948637

Andari, E., Duhamel, J.-R., Zalla, T., Herbrecht, E., Leboyer, M., & Sirigu, A. (2010). Promoting social behavior with oxytocin in high-functioning autism spectrum disorders. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 107(9), 4389-4394. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0910249107

Berg, A. (2018). Ideal Theory and ‘Ought Implies Can.’ Pacific Philosophical Quarterly, 99(4), 869-890. https://doi.org/10.1111/papq.12228

Berker, S. (2009). The normative insignificance of neuroscience. Philosophy and Public Affairs, 37(4), 293-329. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1088-4963.2009.01164.x

Caracciolo, R. (2008). Un dilema en torno a la naturaleza de las normas. Doxa. Cuadernos de Filosofía Del Derecho, 31, 91-103. https://doi.org/10.14198/doxa2008.31.05

Carter, C. S. (1998). Neuroendocrine perspectives on social attachment and love. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 23(8), 779-818. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0306-4530(98)00055-9

Churchland, P. (2012). El cerebro Moral. Paidos.

Churchland, P. S., & Winkielman, P. (2012). Modulating social behavior with oxytocin: how does it work? What does it mean? Hormones and Behavior, 61(3), 392-399. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yhbeh.2011.12.003

Cortina Orts, A. (2017). Aporofobia, el rechazo al pobre. Buenos Aires: Paidós.

Damasio, A. (2005). Brain trust. Nature, 435, 571-572. https://doi.org/10.1038/435571a

De Dreu, C. K. W., Greer, L. L., Van Kleef, G. A., Shalvi, S., & Handgraaf, M. J. J. (2011). Oxytocin promotes human ethnocentrism. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 108(4), 1262-1266. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1015316108

Declerck, C. H., Boone, C., & Kiyonari, T. (2010). Oxytocin and cooperation under conditions of uncertainty: The modulating role of incentives and social information. Hormones and Behavior, 57(3), 368-374. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yhbeh.2010.01.006

DeWall, C. N., Gillath, O., Pressman, S. D., Black, L. L., Bartz, J. A., Moskovitz, J., & Stetler, D. A. (2014). When the Love Hormone Leads to Violence: Oxytocin Increases Intimate Partner Violence Inclinations Among High Trait Aggressive People. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 5(6), 691-697. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550613516876

Fatauros, C. A. (2010). Normas, acciones y posibilidad (Una reflexión sobre la naturaleza de las normas y de las acciones). Doxa. Cuadernos de Filosofía Del Derecho, 33, 671-677. https://doi.org/10.14198/doxa2010.33.35

Greene, J. (2003). From neural “is” to moral “ought”: What are the moral implications of neuroscientific moral psychology? Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 4(10), 846-850. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn1224

Guastella, A. J., & MacLeod, C. (2012). A critical review of the influence of oxytocin nasal spray on social cognition in humans: Evidence and future directions. Hormones and Behavior, 61(3), 410–418. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yhbeh.2012.01.002

Haidt, J. (2001). The emotional dog and its rational tail: A social intuitionist approach to moral judgment. Psychological Review, 108(4), 814-834. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.108.4.814

Howard-Snyder, F. (2013). Ought Implies Can. In H. LaFollette (Ed.), International Encyclopedia of Ethics. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444367072.wbiee402

Hurlemann, R., Patin, A., Onur, O. A., Cohen, M. X., Baumgartner, T., Metzler, S., Dziobek, I., Gallinat, J., Wagner, M., Maier, W., & Kendrick, K. M. (2010). Oxytocin enhances amygdala-dependent, socially reinforced learning and emotional empathy in humans. The Journal of Neuroscience : The Official Journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 30(14), 4999-5007. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5538-09.2010

Kosfeld, M., Heinrichs, M., Zak, P. J., Fischbacher, U., & Fehr, E. (2005). Oxytocin increases trust in humans. Nature, 435(7042), 673-676. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature03701

Kronman, A. (1999). Vivir en el derecho. In M. Bohmner (Ed.), La enseñanza del derecho y el ejercicio de la abogacía. Buenos Aires: Gedisa.

Lara, F. (2017). Oxytocin, empathy and human enhancement. Theoria (Spain), 32(3), 367-384. https://doi.org/10.1387/theoria.17890

Mikolajczak, M., Gross, J. J., Lane, A., Corneille, O., de Timary, P., & Luminet, O. (2010). Oxytocin Makes People Trusting, Not Gullible. Psychological Science, 21(8), 1072-1074. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797610377343

Salles, A. (2013). On the normative implications of social neuroscience. Recerca. Revista de Pensament i Anàlisi, 13, 29-42. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.6035/Recerca.2013.13.3

Sheng, F., Liu, Y., Zhou, B., Zhou, W., & Han, S. (2013). Oxytocin modulates the racial bias in neural responses to others’ suffering. Biological Psychology, 92(2), 380-386. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsycho.2012.11.018

van Ackeren, M., & Kühler, M. (2015). Ethics on (the) edge? Introduction to moral demandingness and “ought implies can.” In M. van Ackeren & M. Kühler (Eds.), The Limits of Moral Obligation: Moral Demandingness and Ought Implies Can, pp. 1-18. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315740812

Vidiella, G. (2008). Tres modelos de motivación moral. En Berrón, M., Gonzalo, A., Prono, M. (Comps.), Acción, pasión y racionalidad. Investigaciones Filosóficas. Ediciones Universidad Nacional del Litoral.

Wudarczyk, O. A., Earp, B. D., Guastella, A., Savulescu, J. (2013). Could intranasal oxytocin be used to enhance relationships? Research imperatives, clinical policy, and ethical considerations. Current Opinion in Psychiatry, 26(5), 474-484. https://doi.org/10.1097/YCO.0b013e3283642e10

Zak, P. (2012). The Moral Molecule. Londres: Penguin Publishing Group.

Zak, P. J., Stanton, A. A., & Ahmadi, S. (2007). Oxytocin Increases Generosity in Humans. PLOS ONE, 2(11), e1128. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0001128

Zak, P., Kurzban, R., & Matzner, W. (2005). Oxytocin is associated with human trustworthiness. Hormones and Behavior, 48(5), 522–527. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yhbeh.2005.07.009

Downloads

Published

2022-12-01 — Updated on 2022-12-02

How to Cite

Garcia Valverde, F., & Fatauros, C. A. (2022). In Favour of a Dialogue Between Neurosciences and Normative Ethics: Moral Enhancement via Sprayed Oxitocine?. Revista De Humanidades De Valparaíso, (20), 57–75. https://doi.org/10.22370/rhv2022iss20pp57-75

Issue

Section

Monographic Section

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.