Bundle Theory and the Problem of Thick Character

Authors

  • Robert K. Garcia Baylor University, Estados Unidos

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22370/rhv2020iss16pp111-136

Keywords:

Bundle Theory, Tropes, Thick Character, Properties, Substance

Abstract

The challenge of thick character consists in explaining the apparent fact that one object can be charactered in many ways. If we assume a trope bundle theory, we ought to answer in turn the two following questions: (P1) What are the requirements on a trope bundle theory if it is to adequately account for thick-character?; (P2) Is a trope bundle theory that meets those requirements preferable to rival theories? In order to address the above questions, the paper proceeds as follows. In the first section I cover two preliminary matters: I introduce the concept of thick-character and distinguish it from other related concepts. Then, I sketch several leading accounts of character and situate bundle theory among them. Also, I pick up (Q1) and argue that there are three requirements on a trope bundle theory if it is to adequately account for thick-character. Lastly, in the third section I pick up (Q2) and argue that the requirements spell trouble for trope bundle theory. This trouble, I argue, indicates that trope bundle theory—and hence bundle theory simpliciter—fails to better its chief rival, substance-attribute theory.

References

Carroll, J. and N. Markosian (2010). An Introduction to Metaphysics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511801143

Denkel, A. (1997). On the compresence of tropes. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 57 (3), 599–606. https://doi.org/10.2307/2953751.

Ehring, D. (2011). Tropes: Properties, Objects, and Mental Causation. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199608539.001.0001

Edwards, D. (2014). Properties. Cambridge: Polity Press.

Garcia, R. (2009). Nominalist Constituent Ontologies: A Development and Critique. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Notre Dame.

Garcia, R. (2014a). Bare Particulars and Constituent Ontology. Acta Analytica, 29 (2), 149-159. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12136-013-0208-2

Garcia, R. (2014b). Bundle Theory’s Black Box: Gap Challenges for the Bundle Theory of Substance. Philosophia, 42 (1), 115-26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11406-013-9466-x

Garcia, R. (2014c). Tropes and Dependency Profiles: Problems for the Nuclear Theory of Substance. American Philosophical Quarterly, 51 (2), 167-76. https://doi.org/10.2307/24475439

Garcia, R. (2015a). Is Trope Theory a Divided House?. En M. Loux y G. Galluzzo (eds.), The Problem of Universals in Contemporary Philosophy, pp. 133-155. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316181539.007

Garcia, R. (2015b). Two Ways to Particularize a Property. Journal of the American Philosophical Association, 1 (4), 635-652. https://doi.org/10.1017/apa.2015.21

Garcia, R. (2016). Tropes as Character-Grounders. Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 94 (3), 499-515. https://doi.org/10.1080/00048402.2015.1106567

Imaguire, G. (2014). In Defense of Quine’s Ostrich Nominalism. Grazer Philosophische Studien, 89 (1), 185-203. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789401211949_014

Imaguire, G. (2018). Priority Nominalism: Grounding Ostrich Nominalism as a Solution to the Problem of Universals. Berlin: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-95004-4.

Jenkins, C. S. (2014). Is Metaphysical Dependence Irreflexive?. The Monist, 94 (2), 267-276. https://doi.org/10.5840/monist201194213

Keinänen, M. (2011). Tropes—The Basic Constituents of Powerful Particulars?. Dialectica, 65 (3), 419-450. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1746-8361.2011.01276.x

Koons, R. y Pickavance, T. (2015). Metaphysics: the Fundamentals. Oxford: Wiley Blackwell.

Lowe, E.J. (2010). On the Individuation of Powers. En A. Marmodoro (ed.), The Metaphysics of Powers: Their Grounding and Their Manifestations, pp. 8–26. New York: Routledge.

Maurin, A. (2002). If Tropes. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-0079-5

Oliver, A. (1996). The Metaphysics of Properties. Mind, 105 (417), 1-80. https://doi.org/10.1093/mind/105.417.1

Robb, D. (2005). Qualitative Unity and the Bundle Theory. The Monist 88(4), 466–92. https://doi.org/10.5840/monist200588424

Rodriguez-Pereyra, G. (2002). Resemblance Nominalism: a Solution to the Problem of Universals. New York: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1080/713659617.

Simons, P. (1994). Particulars in particular clothing: Three trope theories of substance. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 54 (3), 553–575. https://doi.org/10.2307/2108581.

Tahko, T. y Lowe, E. J. (2020). Ontological Dependence. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Summer 2020 Edition). Edward N. Zalta (ed.). URL = <https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/dependence-ontological/#EDG />.

Williams, D. C. (1953). On the Elements of Being: I. The Review of Metaphysics. 7 (1), 3-18. https://doi.org/10.2307/20123348.

Published

2021-01-21

How to Cite

Garcia, R. K. (2021). Bundle Theory and the Problem of Thick Character. Revista De Humanidades De Valparaíso, (16), 111–136. https://doi.org/10.22370/rhv2020iss16pp111-136

Issue

Section

Monographic Section

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.