Person, Property and Contract: A critical dialogue with Hegel from Marx
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22370/rhv2021iss18pp9-26Keywords:
person, property, contract, right, marxist criticismAbstract
Hegel’s Philosophy of Law deals in the Abstract Law section of the categories: person, property and contract. Research critically reconstructs this theory from a Marxist perspective. In the concept of person, first of all, the singular will is reduced to a solipsist will unrelated to intersubjectivity. Then, the concept of Hegelian property bases the private appropriation of property as the externalization of the singular will. This legal property guarantees the maintenance and reproduction of private property, that is, it will guarantee the private accumulation of capital, Marx will say. Anyway, the theory of the contract would link the autonomy of the contracting wills, however, it is a mere appearance, because, in fact, the owners’ wills are under the domination of the capitalist market, as it is explained in Marx’s Capital. The theoretical deficit of Hegel’s Philosophy of Law in general is that the legal concepts of person and property correspond to the abstract will. Hegel describes the juridical description of the legal system of the modern state as the development of free will that legitimizes the asymmetry of civil society in its socioeconomic inequalities.
References
Fichte, Johann Gottlieb (1971). Beitrage zur Berichtigung der Urtheile des Publicums uber die franzosische Revolution (1793). Berlin: De Gruyter.
Hartung, Gerald (2001). Vertrag II. In J. Ritter, K. Gründer, G. Gabriel (eds.), Historisches Wörterbuch der Philosophie, pp. 965-979. Basel: Schwabe.
Hegel, Georg Wilhelm Friedrich (1996). Grundlinien der Philosophie des Rechts oder Naturrecht und Staatswissenschaft im Grundrisse (mit Hegels eigenhändigen Notizen u. den mündl. Zusätzen). Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
Hegel, Georg Wilhelm Friedrich (2016). Ciência da lógica: 1. A doutrina do ser. Rio de Janeiro: Vozes.
Hegel, Georg Wilhelm Friedrich (2021). Princípios da Filosofia do Direito ou Direito Natural e Ciência Política em Compêndio. Porto Alegre: Editora Fundação Fênix.
Hösle, Vittorio (1988). Hegels System. Der Idealismus der Subjektivität und das Problem der Intersubjektivität. Hamburg: Meiner.
Hösle, Vittorio (1997). Moral und Politik. Grundlagen einer Politischen Ethik für das 21. Jahrhundert. München: Beck.
Iber, Christian (2015). Person, Eigentum und Vertrag – der Wille auf dem Rechtsweg in die bürgerliche Gesellschaft. In A. Bavaresco, J. H. Sousa Assai, F. J. Guedes de Lima (Eds.), Estudos de filosofia social e política: Justiça e Reconhecimento. Porto Alegre: Editora Fi.
Ilting, Karl-Heinz (1982). Rechtsphilosophie als Phänomenologie des Bewußtseins der Freiheit. In D. Henrich, R. P. Horstmann (Eds.), Hegels Philosophie des Rechts, pp. 225-254. Stuttgart: Klett-Cotta.
Kant, Immanuel (1968). Kritik der praktischen Vernunft. Grundlegung zur Metaphysik der Sitten. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
Marx, Karl (2013). O capital: Crítica da economia política (1890). São Paulo: Boitempo.
Quante, Michael (1997). „Die Persönlichkeit des Willens“ als Prinzip des abstrakten rechts. Eine Analyse der Begriffslogischen Struktur der §§ 34-40 von Hegels Grundlinien der Philosophie des Rechts. In L. Siep (Ed.), G.W.F. Hegel. Grundlinien der Philosophie des Rechts, pp. 73-94. Berlin: Akademie.
Reinach, Adolf (1913). Die apriorischen Grundlagen des bürgerlichen Rechtes. Jahrbuch für Philosophie und phänomenologische Forschung, 1: 685-847.
Schäfer, Márcio (2018). Bürgerliche Gesellschaft und Staat. Zur Rekonstruktion von Marx’Theorie und Kritik des Staates. Würzburg: Königshausen & Neumann.
Schick, Friederike (2010). Der Begriff der Person in Hegels Rechtsphilosophie. In M. Wichke, A. Przylebski (Eds.), Recht ohne Gerechtigkeit? Hegel und die Grundlinien des Rechtsstaates, pp. 65-81. Würzburg: Königshausen.
Schildbach, Ina (2018). Armut als Unrecht: Zur Aktualität von Hegels Perspektive auf Selbstverwirklichung, Armut und Sozialstaat. Bielefeld: transcript Verlag.
Seelmann, Kurt (2006). Selbstwiderspruch als Grund fur Rechtszwang, Fremdbestimmung von Lebenssinn? In B. Hilmer, G. Lohmann, T. Wesche (Eds.), Anfang und Grenzen des Sinns, pp. 250-263. Weilerswist: Velbrück Wissenschaft.
Theunissen, Michael (1982). Die verdrängte Intersubjektivität in Hegels Philosophie des Rechts. In D. Henrich, R. P. Horstmann (Eds.), Hegels Philosophie des Rechts. Die Theorie der Rechtsformen, pp. 317-381. Stuttgart: Klett-Cotta.
von Savigny, Friedrich Carl (1853). Das Obligationsrecht als Theil des heutigen Römischen Rechts. Berlin: Veit.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Humanities Journal of Valparaíso

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication, with the work after publication simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 International) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).