Submissions

Login or Register to make a submission.

Submission Preparation Checklist

As part of the submission process, authors are required to check off their submission's compliance with all of the following items, and submissions may be returned to authors that do not adhere to these guidelines.
  • The submission has not been previously published, nor is it before another journal for consideration (or an explanation has been provided in Comments to the Editor).
  • The submission file is in OpenOffice, Microsoft Word, RTF, or WordPerfect document file format.
  • Where available, URLs for the references have been provided.
  • The text is single-spaced; uses a 10-point font; employs italics, rather than underlining (except with URL addresses); and all illustrations, figures, and tables are placed within the text at the appropriate points, rather than at the end.
  • The text adheres to the stylistic and bibliographic requirements outlined in the Author Guidelines, which is found in About the Journal.
  • If submitting to a peer-reviewed section of the journal, the instructions in Ensuring a Blind Review have been followed.
  • The author indicates the thematic area for the blind review. For example: 'logic', 'political philosophy'; 'philosophy of science'; 'epistemology; 'metaphysics; 'ethics'; etc.

Author Guidelines

- 2023 update - 

Please submit your original paper through our online system following the links above.

The OJS works best with web browsers other than Internet Explorer. If you need help at any point, email us: rhv.editores@gmail.com

Once you obtain your username and password, log in and click "Author". Then "Start a new submission".

Important:
Complete the form with all your personal information requested, both in Spanish and in English: institutional or personal address, brief biography, full name of the institution (not acronyms). Please indicate your ORCID ID (if you have one). You can include it later by editing your personal data.

Fill the form with all the requested metadata of the paper (title, summary, keywords and others), in English and Spanish (or in the original language in which you wrote the article), and strictly according to the guidelines indicated below.

- ARTICLES - Preparation of the manuscript

Manuscripts should be sent ready for double blind review (no name, institutional affiliation or other references to the author). The authors must indicate the thematic area for the blind review. For example: 'logic', 'political philosophy'; 'philosophy of science'; 'epistemology; 'metaphysics; 'ethics'; etc.

The submission must be in Microsoft Word and PDF files, especially if you make a significant use of mathematical or logical notation in your paper.

Ensuring a Blind Review

To clear metadata from an individual file in Windows:

  1. Access the properties of the file.
  2. Go to File, Info, Check for problems, Inspect document, and then click on Inspect (all the boxes in the list must be selected).
  3. Review the list of results and start cleaning by clicking Remove all, where necessary.
  4. Finally, close the window and save the document again.

In some versions of Word this option is found in: the Microsoft Office button (main menu), Prepare, Inspect document.

To Remove Metadata from a PDF using Adobe Acrobat:

  1. Run Adobe Acrobat as an Administrator. To do this, simply right-click on the Acrobat Pro icon and select Run as administrator.
  2. When the program loads, go to File and select Properties.
  3. A window will appear. From here, select Additional Metadata...
  4. This will display the PDF’s metadata. You will have the option to edit the data or remove it altogether.
  5. Choose to remove it, and then click OK.
  6. After making the appropriate changes, it’s important to remember to save your PDF.
  7. So go back to File and select Save.

The Structure

1. Title in original language (if English, you must translate it into Spanish)

2. Abstract in original language (if English, you must translate it into Spanish)

3. Keywords in the original language (if English, you must translate them into Spanish). They should include at least 5 words that are not included in the title

4. Title in English

5. Abstract in English

6. Keywords in English. At least 5 that are not included in the title

7. Introduction

8. Body of the paper (sections and subsections)

9. Conclusion

10. Bibliographic references.

Length

1) Maximum length of the article is 10,000 words, including the abstract, footnotes and references.
2) Maximum length of the abstract is 300 words.

Images

If the manuscript includes images they should be attached in a separate file in high quality jpg format. If the images are not sufficiently clear, the editors reserve the right to exclude them from the publication. The author must also send the corresponding permission to use the image if it does not belong to the author or is not free of copyright.

Metadata

The author must clear the file of metadata in order to guarantee the blind review.

Typography and others

All text in Times New Roman font, size 12 point and single line spacing.

The different sections of the text should be numbered and in bold. Do not inden the section title.

Neither bold nor underlining should be used inside the text.

Footnotes in Times New Roman font, size 10, single line spacing.

Do not indent the beginning of paragraphs.

Important: The titles and subtitles in Spanish should only be capitalized in the first letter of the first word. You should not start each word with a capital letter, except for proper names. Also do not use capital letters for the entire title. In English you can start the word of the titles in capital letter but following the rule for English titles.

References

References should appear at the end of the document under the heading of "References" and organized in alphabetical order.

The Author-Date System must be used.

VERY IMPORTANT: You must indicate the DOI registration for references (all articles, books, reviews, etc.); if it is not possible, indicate the entire URLs, for example: https://doi.org/10.22370/rhv2014iss4

Only those publications that have been used for the manuscript and that are specifically cited in the work should be included.

According to the style indicated, the bibliographical references must be inserted within the text, indicating in parentheses only the author's surname, year of publication and the page (s).

The bibliography should come at the end of the article in alphabetical order, repeating the surnames in the case of several books or articles by the same author, followed by the year of publication corresponding to the bibliographic reference indicated in the article. Texts by the same author must be ordered according to their order of appearance.

Citations within the text of the manuscript (Author-Date Style)

When the quotation has less than 40 words, it should be included within the text, in quotation marks and without italics. A period (full stop) should be written at the end of the quotation and its data.

If the citation has more than 40 words, the text is written as a block, without quotation marks, on a separate line, with indentation. At the end of the quotation the period is placed before the data.

The volume of quotations should not exceed 10% of the total text.

Footnotes (Very Important)

Notes should be placed at the bottom of the page and numbered consecutively.

We recommend keeping the number and length of footnotes to a minimum. It is preferable that each footnote should be no longer than two lines and that the total number of footnotes in the article should not exceed 10.

We recommend not including bibliographical references or citations in footnotes.

NOTES AT THE END OF THE ARTICLE WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED.

HEADINGS AND QUOTATIONS AT THE BEGINNING OF THE TEXT OR EACH SECTION WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED.

Tables, graphs, figures and charts

Tables or charts should be presented in the body of the text. They must be accompanied by their corresponding title and legend and numbered consecutively, in Times New Roman font and size 10 point.

The figures or graphs should be presented in high quality PNG or JPEG files.

BOOK REVIEWS:

The submitted book reviews must be from recently published books, from the current year.

A full book review may concern only one book or monograph or several works. Its length is about 750-1000 words (use 12-point Times New Roman, and defer to the Author-Date Manual of Style for questions of formatting). It should give readers an engaging, informative, and critical discussion of the work.

The most important point in developing a book review is to address the Journal’s readership: international and interdisciplinary. The review should consider:

  • The intended audience for the book and who would find it useful;
  • The background of the author;
  • The main ideas and major objectives of the book and how effectively these are accomplished;
  • The soundness of methods and information sources used;
  • A comparison with other works on this subject;
  • Constructive comments about the strength and weaknesses of the book;
  • For edited books: dominant themes with reference to specific chapters as appropriate; and implications of the book for research, policy, practice, or theory.

The header of your review should include:

  • Author(s) or editor(s) first and last name(s) (please indicate if it is an edited book)
  • Title of book
  • Year of publication
  • Place of publication
  • Publisher
  • Number of pages
  • Price (please indicate paperback or hard cover) if available
  • ISBN

At the end of your review, please include:

  • Your first and last name
  • Email
  • Institution affiliation
  • A brief biographical

EXAMPLE OF CITATIONS AND REFERENCES

- Quotes -

Quote inside the text:

   Frege (1879, p. 44) or (Frege 1879, p. 44), as applicable.

   Heidegger (1939, pp. 31-45) or (Heidegger 1939, pp. 31-45)

If it is more than one reference in the same quote:

   Frege (1879; 1901) or (Frege 1879; 1901).

If the author has more than one publication per year, they are differentiated with lowercase letters according to their order of appearance. Example:

   Frege (1879a; 1879b) or (Frege 1879a; 1879b)

   Frege (1879b, p. 34) or (Frege 1879b, p. 34)

When the cited book has more than one author:

   Two authors: Frege y Dedekind (1879, p. 44 ) or
   (Frege y Dedekind 1879, p. 44)

   Three authors: Frege, Dedekind y Peano (1879, p. 44) or
   (Frege, Dedekind y Peano 1879, p. 44)

   More than three: Frege et al. (2006) or (Frege et al. 2006)

- Bibliography -

The bibliography should come at the end of the article in alphabetical order, repeating the surnames in the case of several books or articles by the same author, followed by the year of publication corresponding to the bibliographic reference indicated in the article. Texts by the same author must be ordered according to their order of appearance.

Books

   Surname(s), Name(s) (year). Title. Publisher.

One author:

Carnap, Rudolf (1947). Meaning and Necessity. Chicago University Press.

Two authors:

Redmond, J., & Fontaine, M. (2011). How to Play Dialogues. An Introduction to Dialogical Logic. College Publications.

Three or more authors:

Lorenzen, P, Lorenz, K., & Rahman, S. (1978). Dialogische Logik. Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.

Book with editor(s)

Gabriel, G., Hermes, H., Kambartel, F., Thiel, C., Veraart, A., McGuinness, B., & Kaal, H. (Eds.) (1980). Gottlob Frege. Philosophical and Mathematical Correspondence. Basil Blackwell.

Book chapters

One author:

Rowe, D. (2000). The Calm Before the Storm: Hilbert’s Early Viewson Foundations. In F. E. A. Hendricks (Ed.), Proof Theory. History and Philosophical Significance (pp. 55-94). Kluwer Academic Publisher.

Two or more authors:

Knuuttila, T., & Merz, M. (2009). Understanding by Modeling An Objectual Approach. In H. W. de Regt, S. Leonelli, K. Eigner (Eds.), Scientific Understanding. Philosophical Perspectives (pp. 146-168). University of Pittsburgh Press.

Journal articles

Surname(s), Name(s) (year). Paper title. Journal Name, Volume(Issue), pages. doi.

One author:

Cummins, R. (1975). Functional Analysis. The Journal of Philosophy, 72(20), 741-765. https://doi.org/10.2307/2024640

Two or more authors:

de Regt, H. W., & Dieks, D. (2005). A contextual approach to scientific understanding. Synthese, 144(1), 137-170. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-005-5000-4

Online references

Blanchette, P. (2012). The Frege-Hilbert Controversy. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/frege-hilbert/

Privacy Statement

The names and email addresses entered in this journal site will be used exclusively for the stated purposes of this journal and will not be made available for any other purpose or to any other party.